public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/43895] New: [fortran-dev] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed
@ 2010-04-26 14:32 sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it
2010-04-26 14:34 ` [Bug fortran/43895] " sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it
` (14 more replies)
0 siblings, 15 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it @ 2010-04-26 14:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2267 bytes --]
The attached code produces the subject message, but only with optimization; at
-O0 it works.
------ behaviour ----------
[sfilippo@localhost bug14]$ gfortran -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gfortran
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/home/local/gnudev/bin/../libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.6.0/lto-wrapper
Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../fortran-dev/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gnudev
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran : (reconfigured) ../fortran-dev/configure
--prefix=/usr/local/gnudev --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,lto --no-create
--no-recursion : (reconfigured) ../fortran-dev/configure
--prefix=/usr/local/gnudev --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,lto --no-create
--no-recursion : (reconfigured) ../fortran-dev/configure
--prefix=/usr/local/gnudev --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,lto --no-create
--no-recursion : (reconfigured) ../fortran-dev/configure
--prefix=/usr/local/gnudev --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,lto --no-create
--no-recursion : (reconfigured) ../fortran-dev/configure
--prefix=/usr/local/gnudev --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,lto --no-create
--no-recursion : (reconfigured) ../fortran-dev/configure
--prefix=/usr/local/gnudev --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,lto --no-create
--no-recursion
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.6.0 20100421 (experimental) (GCC)
[sfilippo@localhost bug14]$ gfortran -O1 -c bug14.f90
bug14.f90: In function bug14:
bug14.f90:30:0: error: statement makes a memory store, but has no VDEFS
a_4.a.$data = 0B;
bug14.f90:30:0: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
[sfilippo@localhost bug14]$ gfortran -O0 -c bug14.f90
[sfilippo@localhost bug14]$
--
Summary: [fortran-dev] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed
Product: gcc
Version: fortran-dev
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43895
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/43895] [fortran-dev] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed
2010-04-26 14:32 [Bug fortran/43895] New: [fortran-dev] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it
@ 2010-04-26 14:34 ` sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it
2010-04-26 14:38 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it @ 2010-04-26 14:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it 2010-04-26 14:34 -------
Created an attachment (id=20491)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20491&action=view)
test-case
Funny thing: if I change the declaration
type(d_sparse_mat)
into
class(d_sparse_mat)
then it compiles.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43895
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/43895] [fortran-dev] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed
2010-04-26 14:32 [Bug fortran/43895] New: [fortran-dev] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it
2010-04-26 14:34 ` [Bug fortran/43895] " sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it
@ 2010-04-26 14:38 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-26 14:56 ` janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-04-26 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-26 14:38 -------
smells like DECL_VALUE_EXPR
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GCC build triplet| i686-pc-linux-gnu |i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet| i686-pc-linux-gnu |i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet| i686-pc-linux-gnu |i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43895
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/43895] [fortran-dev] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed
2010-04-26 14:32 [Bug fortran/43895] New: [fortran-dev] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it
2010-04-26 14:34 ` [Bug fortran/43895] " sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it
2010-04-26 14:38 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-04-26 14:56 ` janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-26 15:04 ` [Bug fortran/43895] [OOP] " janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: janus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-04-26 14:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-26 14:56 -------
Note: There is another OOP PR which fails only with optimization: PR41753.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43895
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/43895] [OOP] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed
2010-04-26 14:32 [Bug fortran/43895] New: [fortran-dev] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-04-26 14:56 ` janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-04-26 15:04 ` janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-26 15:33 ` sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it
` (10 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: janus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-04-26 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-26 15:04 -------
Confirmed.
It seems this fails already with the 4.5 release as well as with current trunk,
which means that it's not specific to the fortran-dev branch.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-04-26 15:04:01
date| |
Summary|[fortran-dev] internal |[OOP] internal compiler
|compiler error: verify_ssa |error: verify_ssa failed
|failed |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43895
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/43895] [OOP] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed
2010-04-26 14:32 [Bug fortran/43895] New: [fortran-dev] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2010-04-26 15:04 ` [Bug fortran/43895] [OOP] " janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-04-26 15:33 ` sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it
2010-05-06 16:28 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it @ 2010-04-26 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 711 bytes --]
------- Comment #5 from sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it 2010-04-26 15:32 -------
(In reply to comment #0)
> The attached code produces the subject message, but only with optimization; at
> -O0 it works.
> ------ behaviour ----------
> [sfilippo@localhost bug14]$ gfortran -O1 -c bug14.f90
> bug14.f90: In function bug14:
> bug14.f90:30:0: error: statement makes a memory store, but has no VDEFS
> a_4.a.$data = 0B;
> bug14.f90:30:0: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed
> Please submit a full bug report,
> with preprocessed source if appropriate.
> See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
>
Fails at -O2 and -O3 as well..
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43895
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/43895] [OOP] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed
2010-04-26 14:32 [Bug fortran/43895] New: [fortran-dev] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2010-04-26 15:33 ` sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it
@ 2010-05-06 16:28 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-17 20:22 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-05-06 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-06 16:28 -------
See also PR 43990 - I think the PRs might be related, though I have not really
studied this PR.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43895
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/43895] [OOP] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed
2010-04-26 14:32 [Bug fortran/43895] New: [fortran-dev] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2010-05-06 16:28 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-05-17 20:22 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-17 20:35 ` janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-05-17 20:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-17 20:22 -------
Propagate comment from PR 43990:
There seems to be an inconsistency with CLASS with POINTER
or ALLOCATABLE attribute: Is "class.$DATA" or "class" the pointer variable. If
one adds "b = ALLOCATED(x)" one finds:
x.a.$data = 0B; ! Default initialization sets class.$data to NULL
D.1577 = &x->a; ! ALLOCATED check looks at "(class != NULL)"
b = D.1577 != 0B;
Which does not make sense. [This might be unrelated to the ICE.]
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43895
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/43895] [OOP] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed
2010-04-26 14:32 [Bug fortran/43895] New: [fortran-dev] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2010-05-17 20:22 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-05-17 20:35 ` janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-18 10:41 ` sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it
` (6 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: janus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-05-17 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-17 20:35 -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> If one adds "b = ALLOCATED(x)" one finds:
Where do you add this? I don't see a test case where this fits into. Can you
give a complete example?
Btw, after the recent patch for PR43969, this might well be fixed already ...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43895
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/43895] [OOP] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed
2010-04-26 14:32 [Bug fortran/43895] New: [fortran-dev] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2010-05-17 20:35 ` janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-05-18 10:41 ` sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it
2010-05-18 12:19 ` janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it @ 2010-05-18 10:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it 2010-05-18 10:41 -------
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #7)
>
> Btw, after the recent patch for PR43969, this might well be fixed already ...
>
Unfortunately, no, I still get the ICE.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43895
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/43895] [OOP] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed
2010-04-26 14:32 [Bug fortran/43895] New: [fortran-dev] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2010-05-18 10:41 ` sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it
@ 2010-05-18 12:19 ` janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-18 12:25 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: janus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-05-18 12:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-18 12:19 -------
(In reply to comment #9)
> > Btw, after the recent patch for PR43969, this might well be fixed already ...
> >
> Unfortunately, no, I still get the ICE.
Sure. Actually my comment was only targeted towards Tobias' ALLOCATED example,
not the original ICE :)
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43895
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/43895] [OOP] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed
2010-04-26 14:32 [Bug fortran/43895] New: [fortran-dev] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2010-05-18 12:19 ` janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-05-18 12:25 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-05 10:40 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-05-18 12:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #11 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-18 12:24 -------
(In reply to comment #8)
> > If one adds "b = ALLOCATED(x)" one finds:
> Where do you add this?
Add in bug14 of attachment 20491 before 'end subroutine':
logical b
b = allocated(a%a)
However, this is now fixed.
* * *
There are other problems related to allocatable scalars, but I think those are
tracked in PR 42647. For instance (again based on attachment 20491):
use d_mat_mod
implicit none
type(d_sparse_mat), ALLOCATABLE :: x
call bug14(x) ! << OK around here
contains
subroutine bug14(a)
type(d_sparse_mat), ALLOCATABLE, intent(out) :: a
logical b
! <<< ICE here
b = allocated(a); if (b) call abort() ! << OK here
end subroutine bug14
end
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43895
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/43895] [OOP] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed
2010-04-26 14:32 [Bug fortran/43895] New: [fortran-dev] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2010-05-18 12:25 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-06-05 10:40 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-05 14:08 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-05 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #12 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-05 10:40 -------
(In reply to comment #11)
OK, all this has a simple explanation. A revamped version of the original
testcase segfaults in runtime, at -O0.
! { dg-do compile }
! Test the fix for PR43895, in which the dummy 'a' was not
! dereferenced for the deallocation of component 'a', as required
! for INTENT(OUT).
!
! Contributed by Salvatore Filippone <sfilippone@uniroma2.it>
!
module d_mat_mod
type :: base_sparse_mat
end type base_sparse_mat
type, extends(base_sparse_mat) :: d_base_sparse_mat
integer :: i
end type d_base_sparse_mat
type :: d_sparse_mat
class(d_base_sparse_mat), allocatable :: a
end type d_sparse_mat
end module d_mat_mod
use d_mat_mod
type(d_sparse_mat) :: b
allocate (b%a)
b%a%i = 42
call bug14 (b)
if (allocated (b%a)) call abort
contains
subroutine bug14(a)
implicit none
type(d_sparse_mat), intent(out) :: a
end subroutine bug14
end
! { dg-final { cleanup-modules "d_mat_mod " } }
The reason is quite clear from the code below:
bug14 (struct d_sparse_mat & restrict a)
{
if (a.a.$data != 0B)
{
__builtin_free ((void *) a.a.$data);
}
a.a.$data = 0B;
}
The dummy 'a' needs dereferencing, thus...
bug14 (struct d_sparse_mat & restrict a)
{
if (a->a.$data != 0B)
{
__builtin_free ((void *) a->a.$data);
}
a->a.$data = 0B;
}
This patch is regtesting right now:
Index: /svn/trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
===================================================================
*** /svn/trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c (revision 159851)
--- /svn/trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c (working copy)
*************** structure_alloc_comps (gfc_symbol * der_
*** 5951,5957 ****
gfc_init_block (&fnblock);
! if (POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (decl)) && rank != 0)
decl = build_fold_indirect_ref_loc (input_location,
decl);
--- 5951,5958 ----
gfc_init_block (&fnblock);
! if ((POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (decl)) && rank != 0)
! || (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (decl)) == REFERENCE_TYPE && rank == 0))
decl = build_fold_indirect_ref_loc (input_location,
decl);
Cheers
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2010-04-26 15:04:01 |2010-06-05 10:40:32
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43895
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/43895] [OOP] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed
2010-04-26 14:32 [Bug fortran/43895] New: [fortran-dev] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2010-06-05 10:40 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-06-05 14:08 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-05 17:52 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-06 3:17 ` janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-05 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #13 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-05 14:08 -------
(In reply to comment #12)
This is tiresome - it regtested fine, I update the tree and now I get failures
on:
alloc_comp_result_1.f90
alloc_comp_scalar_1.f90
alloc_comp_transformational_1.f90
All three segfault at runtime. Happily, if I revert the above patch, they
still segfault.
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43895
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/43895] [OOP] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed
2010-04-26 14:32 [Bug fortran/43895] New: [fortran-dev] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2010-06-05 14:08 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-06-05 17:52 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-06 3:17 ` janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-05 17:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #14 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-05 17:51 -------
Subject: Bug 43895
Author: pault
Date: Sat Jun 5 17:51:39 2010
New Revision: 160326
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=160326
Log:
2010-06-05 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/43895
* trans-array.c (structure_alloc_comps): Dereference scalar
'decl' if it is a REFERENCE_TYPE. Tidy expressions containing
TREE_TYPE (decl).
2010-06-05 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/43895
* gfortran.dg/alloc_comp_class_1.f90 : New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/alloc_comp_class_1.f90
Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43895
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/43895] [OOP] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed
2010-04-26 14:32 [Bug fortran/43895] New: [fortran-dev] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2010-06-05 17:52 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-06-06 3:17 ` janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: janus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-06 3:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #15 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-06 03:17 -------
I guess we can close this, right?
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43895
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-06-06 3:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-04-26 14:32 [Bug fortran/43895] New: [fortran-dev] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it
2010-04-26 14:34 ` [Bug fortran/43895] " sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it
2010-04-26 14:38 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-26 14:56 ` janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-26 15:04 ` [Bug fortran/43895] [OOP] " janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-26 15:33 ` sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it
2010-05-06 16:28 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-17 20:22 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-17 20:35 ` janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-18 10:41 ` sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it
2010-05-18 12:19 ` janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-18 12:25 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-05 10:40 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-05 14:08 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-05 17:52 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-06 3:17 ` janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).