public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "bernds at codesourcery dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/43858] [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap failure for powerpc-apple-darwin9: cannot compute suffix of object files
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 22:54:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100426225407.15706.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-43858-12313@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
------- Comment #13 from bernds at codesourcery dot com 2010-04-26 22:54 -------
I've tried the two versions of ifcvt.c with a powerpc-apple-darwin9 cross
compiler. Out of many megabytes of testcases, I can find only one code
generation difference with "-O2 -fomit-frame-pointer" for this target, and that
looks correct as far as I can tell from the rtl dumps and assembly.
If the testsuite run produces nothing, can you check the object files of the
two stage2 compilers (working and broken) for differences in code generation?
That could help narrow down which file is being miscompiled.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43858
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-26 22:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-22 20:53 [Bug bootstrap/43858] New: " dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-04-23 12:34 ` [Bug bootstrap/43858] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-23 22:08 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-04-23 22:16 ` lacombar at gmail dot com
2010-04-25 14:31 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-04-25 14:40 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-25 15:40 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-04-26 9:16 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-04-26 12:11 ` bernds at codesourcery dot com
2010-04-26 12:28 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-04-26 12:56 ` bernds at codesourcery dot com
2010-04-26 13:16 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-04-26 13:19 ` bernds at codesourcery dot com
2010-04-26 16:26 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-04-26 22:54 ` bernds at codesourcery dot com [this message]
2010-04-27 9:39 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-04-27 9:47 ` bernds at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-27 15:25 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-04-27 15:27 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-04-27 22:27 ` bernds at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-28 8:50 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-04-28 8:54 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-04-28 13:20 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-04-28 13:59 ` bernds at codesourcery dot com
2010-04-28 16:50 ` howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
2010-04-28 17:08 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-04-28 19:27 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-04-28 19:33 ` bernds at codesourcery dot com
2010-04-29 11:05 ` bernds at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-29 15:11 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
[not found] <bug-43858-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2011-05-02 14:17 ` uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100426225407.15706.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).