From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16794 invoked by alias); 30 Apr 2010 15:42:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 16650 invoked by uid 48); 30 Apr 2010 15:41:40 -0000 Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 15:42:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100430154140.16648.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c++/43947] [C++0x] constexpr should allow declaration without a definition In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg03363.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #4 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-04-30 15:41 ------- > I am aware constexpr is not fully supported, To be clear: officially, is not supported *at all*. If Jason told you that we want to remember this specific detail in Bugzilla, fine, of course. You may want to add in CC Gaby, also: AFAIK: he is still working on the GCC constexpr. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43947