public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/41442]  New: missed optimization for boolean expression
@ 2009-09-23  6:49 carrot at google dot com
  2009-09-23  6:50 ` [Bug tree-optimization/41442] " carrot at google dot com
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: carrot at google dot com @ 2009-09-23  6:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

The boolean expression ((p1->next && !p2->next) || p2->next) can be simplified
as (p1->next || p2->next), but gcc failed to detect this.


The attached source code is an example, compile it with options -Os
-march=armv5te -mthumb, I got

        push    {lr}
        ldr     r3, [r0]    
        cmp     r3, #0      
        beq     .L2         
        ldr     r3, [r1]    // redundant load and comparison
        mov     r0, #0      
        cmp     r3, #0      //
        beq     .L3         // can branch to L3 directly
.L2:
        ldr     r0, [r1]
        neg     r3, r0
        adc     r0, r0, r3
.L3:
        @ sp needed for prologue
        pop     {pc}


-- 
           Summary: missed optimization for boolean expression
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.5.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: tree-optimization
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: carrot at google dot com
 GCC build triplet: i686-linux
  GCC host triplet: i686-linux
GCC target triplet: arm-eabi


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41442


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/41442] missed optimization for boolean expression
  2009-09-23  6:49 [Bug tree-optimization/41442] New: missed optimization for boolean expression carrot at google dot com
@ 2009-09-23  6:50 ` carrot at google dot com
  2009-09-23  8:50 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: carrot at google dot com @ 2009-09-23  6:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from carrot at google dot com  2009-09-23 06:49 -------
Created an attachment (id=18634)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18634&action=view)
test case


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41442


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/41442] missed optimization for boolean expression
  2009-09-23  6:49 [Bug tree-optimization/41442] New: missed optimization for boolean expression carrot at google dot com
  2009-09-23  6:50 ` [Bug tree-optimization/41442] " carrot at google dot com
@ 2009-09-23  8:50 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-09-23  9:24 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-09-23  8:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-09-23 08:50 -------
You wound need to enable PRE implement code hoisting to remove the redundant
load (or write the condition as p2->next || (p1->next && !p2->next)).
PRE is run too late
to help generate optimal code though as ifcombine runs before it and
ifcombine wouldn't deal with the if-converted form that is present then.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |enhancement
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2009-09-23 08:50:35
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41442


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/41442] missed optimization for boolean expression
  2009-09-23  6:49 [Bug tree-optimization/41442] New: missed optimization for boolean expression carrot at google dot com
  2009-09-23  6:50 ` [Bug tree-optimization/41442] " carrot at google dot com
  2009-09-23  8:50 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-09-23  9:24 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-04-24 18:54 ` bernds at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-05-05 18:49 ` bernds at gcc dot gnu dot org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-09-23  9:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-09-23 09:24 -------
Or fold could handle this...


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41442


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/41442] missed optimization for boolean expression
  2009-09-23  6:49 [Bug tree-optimization/41442] New: missed optimization for boolean expression carrot at google dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-09-23  9:24 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-04-24 18:54 ` bernds at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-05-05 18:49 ` bernds at gcc dot gnu dot org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: bernds at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-04-24 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #4 from bernds at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-24 18:54 -------
Subject: Bug 41442

Author: bernds
Date: Sat Apr 24 18:53:47 2010
New Revision: 158689

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=158689
Log:
gcc/
        PR tree-optimization/41442
        * fold-const.c (merge_truthop_with_opposite_arm): New function.
        (fold_binary_loc): Call it.

gcc/testsuite/
        PR tree-optimization/41442
        * gcc.target/i386/pr41442.c: New test.


Added:
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr41442.c
Modified:
    trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/fold-const.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41442


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/41442] missed optimization for boolean expression
  2009-09-23  6:49 [Bug tree-optimization/41442] New: missed optimization for boolean expression carrot at google dot com
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-04-24 18:54 ` bernds at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-05-05 18:49 ` bernds at gcc dot gnu dot org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: bernds at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-05-05 18:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #5 from bernds at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-05-05 18:48 -------
Fixed.


-- 

bernds at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41442


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-05-05 18:49 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-09-23  6:49 [Bug tree-optimization/41442] New: missed optimization for boolean expression carrot at google dot com
2009-09-23  6:50 ` [Bug tree-optimization/41442] " carrot at google dot com
2009-09-23  8:50 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-09-23  9:24 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-24 18:54 ` bernds at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-05 18:49 ` bernds at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).