* [Bug c/43744] SH: Error: pcrel too far
2010-04-13 6:10 [Bug c/43744] New: SH: Error: pcrel too far iwamatsu at nigauri dot org
@ 2010-04-13 6:12 ` iwamatsu at nigauri dot org
2010-04-13 6:35 ` [Bug target/43744] " kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: iwamatsu at nigauri dot org @ 2010-04-13 6:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from iwamatsu at nigauri dot org 2010-04-13 06:12 -------
Created an attachment (id=20376)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20376&action=view)
source code that can reproduce problem
This is the source code that can reproduce a problem.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43744
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug target/43744] SH: Error: pcrel too far
2010-04-13 6:10 [Bug c/43744] New: SH: Error: pcrel too far iwamatsu at nigauri dot org
2010-04-13 6:12 ` [Bug c/43744] " iwamatsu at nigauri dot org
@ 2010-04-13 6:35 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-13 6:56 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-04-13 6:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-13 06:34 -------
Confirmd.
--
kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Component|c |target
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
GCC host triplet|sh4-unknown-linux-gnu |
GCC target triplet| |sh4-unknown-linux-gnu
Known to fail| |4.4.3
Known to work| |4.3.4 4.5.0 4.6.0
Priority|P3 |P4
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-04-13 06:34:52
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43744
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug target/43744] SH: Error: pcrel too far
2010-04-13 6:10 [Bug c/43744] New: SH: Error: pcrel too far iwamatsu at nigauri dot org
2010-04-13 6:12 ` [Bug c/43744] " iwamatsu at nigauri dot org
2010-04-13 6:35 ` [Bug target/43744] " kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-04-13 6:56 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-13 8:09 ` iwamatsu at nigauri dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-04-13 6:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-13 06:56 -------
Looks that Christian's patch pic-cp.patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19794
in PR target/42841 can fix the problem. Could you
please try it?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43744
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug target/43744] SH: Error: pcrel too far
2010-04-13 6:10 [Bug c/43744] New: SH: Error: pcrel too far iwamatsu at nigauri dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-04-13 6:56 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-04-13 8:09 ` iwamatsu at nigauri dot org
2010-04-13 10:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: iwamatsu at nigauri dot org @ 2010-04-13 8:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from iwamatsu at nigauri dot org 2010-04-13 08:09 -------
Hi,
(In reply to comment #3)
> Looks that Christian's patch pic-cp.patch
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19794
>
> in PR target/42841 can fix the problem. Could you
> please try it?
>
I confirmed that this problem was revised.
Do you have the plan applying this patch?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43744
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug target/43744] SH: Error: pcrel too far
2010-04-13 6:10 [Bug c/43744] New: SH: Error: pcrel too far iwamatsu at nigauri dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2010-04-13 8:09 ` iwamatsu at nigauri dot org
@ 2010-04-13 10:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-15 11:55 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-04-13 10:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-13 10:29 -------
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 42841 ***
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43744
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug target/43744] SH: Error: pcrel too far
2010-04-13 6:10 [Bug c/43744] New: SH: Error: pcrel too far iwamatsu at nigauri dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2010-04-13 10:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-04-15 11:55 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-16 22:34 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-04-15 11:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-15 11:55 -------
I've tried 4.4 head & 42841 pic-cp.patch and got "pcrel too far"
for the test case db4.8-x.c. So unfortunately, there is still
a different issue from 42841. I'd like to reopen this bug.
--
kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|kkojima at rr dot iij4u dot |
|or dot jp |
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|DUPLICATE |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43744
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug target/43744] SH: Error: pcrel too far
2010-04-13 6:10 [Bug c/43744] New: SH: Error: pcrel too far iwamatsu at nigauri dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2010-04-15 11:55 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-04-16 22:34 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-22 22:03 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-04-16 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-16 22:34 -------
Created an attachment (id=20404)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20404&action=view)
A bit reduced test case
It seems that we see a yet another corner case for find_barrier.
Also it looks latent on the trunk and 4.5. Here is what is going
on, I guess.
For PIC, sh.c:fixup_mova replaces casesi_worker_1 insn with
casesi_worker_2 insn and a constant table entry is added to
a constant pool. In the problematic case, find_barrier inserts
this constant pool in the middle of insns for casesi_worker_2.
Then the constant pool including the above constant table entry
is put before some of those insns.
This results a code sequence like
mov.l .L94,r0 ! insn for casesi_worker_2
...
CP:
.long bar
...
.L94:
.long .L24-.L86
.align 5
.L87:
add r0,r1 ! insn for casesi_worker_2
mova .L86,r0 ! insn for casesi_worker_2
mov.b @(r0,r1),r1 ! insn for casesi_worker_2
...
.L24:
.byte .L22-.L25
.byte .L23-.L25
...
otherCP:
.L86:
which looks unexpected to the range computation in find_barrier.
It seems that the constant entry .long .L24-.L86 was assumed to
be put after the label .L86. The patch below is an experimental
one to avoid the issue, though there would be better ways.
--- ORIG/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/config/sh/sh.c 2010-04-15 19:59:21.000000000
+0900
+++ gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/config/sh/sh.c 2010-04-16 19:46:26.000000000 +0900
@@ -3884,6 +3884,7 @@ find_barrier (int num_mova, rtx mova, rt
int si_limit;
int hi_limit;
rtx orig = from;
+ rtx last_symoff = NULL_RTX;
/* For HImode: range is 510, add 4 because pc counts from address of
second instruction after this one, subtract 2 for the jump instruction
@@ -4013,8 +4014,17 @@ find_barrier (int num_mova, rtx mova, rt
if (mova_p (from))
{
+ rtx src;
+
switch (untangle_mova (&num_mova, &mova, from))
{
+ case 1:
+ src = SET_SRC (PATTERN (from));
+ if (GET_CODE (src) == CONST
+ && GET_CODE (XEXP (src, 0)) == UNSPEC
+ && XINT (XEXP (src, 0), 1) == UNSPEC_SYMOFF)
+ last_symoff = from;
+ break;
case 0: return find_barrier (0, 0, mova);
case 2:
{
@@ -4120,6 +4130,9 @@ find_barrier (int num_mova, rtx mova, rt
so we'll make one. */
rtx label = gen_label_rtx ();
+ if (last_symoff)
+ from = last_symoff;
+
/* If we exceeded the range, then we must back up over the last
instruction we looked at. Otherwise, we just need to undo the
NEXT_INSN at the end of the loop. */
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43744
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug target/43744] SH: Error: pcrel too far
2010-04-13 6:10 [Bug c/43744] New: SH: Error: pcrel too far iwamatsu at nigauri dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2010-04-16 22:34 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-04-22 22:03 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-05 22:12 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-04-22 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-22 22:03 -------
Subject: Bug 43744
Author: kkojima
Date: Thu Apr 22 22:02:55 2010
New Revision: 158655
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=158655
Log:
PR target/43744
* config/sh/sh.c (find_barrier): Don't emit a constant pool
in the middle of insns for casesi_worker_2.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/config/sh/sh.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43744
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug target/43744] SH: Error: pcrel too far
2010-04-13 6:10 [Bug c/43744] New: SH: Error: pcrel too far iwamatsu at nigauri dot org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2010-04-22 22:03 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-05-05 22:12 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-05 22:28 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-05 22:46 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-05-05 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-05 22:12 -------
Subject: Bug 43744
Author: kkojima
Date: Wed May 5 22:12:17 2010
New Revision: 159087
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=159087
Log:
Backport from mainline:
2010-04-22 Kaz Kojima <kkojima@gcc.gnu.org>
PR target/43744
* config/sh/sh.c (find_barrier): Don't emit a constant pool
in the middle of insns for casesi_worker_2.
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/gcc/config/sh/sh.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43744
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug target/43744] SH: Error: pcrel too far
2010-04-13 6:10 [Bug c/43744] New: SH: Error: pcrel too far iwamatsu at nigauri dot org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2010-05-05 22:12 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-05-05 22:28 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-05 22:46 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-05-05 22:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-05 22:28 -------
Subject: Bug 43744
Author: kkojima
Date: Wed May 5 22:27:57 2010
New Revision: 159088
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=159088
Log:
Backport from mainline:
2010-04-22 Kaz Kojima <kkojima@gcc.gnu.org>
PR target/43744
* config/sh/sh.c (find_barrier): Don't emit a constant pool
in the middle of insns for casesi_worker_2.
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/config/sh/sh.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43744
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug target/43744] SH: Error: pcrel too far
2010-04-13 6:10 [Bug c/43744] New: SH: Error: pcrel too far iwamatsu at nigauri dot org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2010-05-05 22:28 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-05-05 22:46 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-05-05 22:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #11 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-05 22:46 -------
Fixed.
--
kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43744
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/43744] SH: Error: pcrel too far
[not found] <bug-43744-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2014-08-30 0:22 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-08-30 5:01 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-08-30 0:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43744
Kazumoto Kojima <kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to work| |
--- Comment #13 from Kazumoto Kojima <kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #12)
> I'm seeing this issue again when compiling binutils-2.24.51.20140818 with
> gcc-4.9.1, but I am not sure whether the issues are related.
I can't reproduce it in my environment. Could you please
attach the preprocessed .i file for the problematic case?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug target/43744] SH: Error: pcrel too far
[not found] <bug-43744-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2014-08-30 0:22 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-08-30 5:01 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2014-09-23 18:50 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de @ 2014-08-30 5:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43744
--- Comment #14 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de> ---
Hi Kazumoto!
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #13)
> (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #12)
> > I'm seeing this issue again when compiling binutils-2.24.51.20140818 with
> > gcc-4.9.1, but I am not sure whether the issues are related.
>
> I can't reproduce it in my environment. Could you please
> attach the preprocessed .i file for the problematic case?
Thanks a lot for your quick reply. I will do a manual rebuild as soon as
possible and include the "--save-temps" flag to gcc to produce the .i file(s)
you requested.
I am currently at DebConf, so my time is a bit short, but I will get back to
you as soon as possible, around next week.
Cheers,
Adrian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug target/43744] SH: Error: pcrel too far
[not found] <bug-43744-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2014-08-30 0:22 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-08-30 5:01 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
@ 2014-09-23 18:50 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2021-10-08 22:25 ` giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de @ 2014-09-23 18:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43744
--- Comment #15 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de> ---
Hmm, so for whatever reason, the problem does not occur again anymore and
binutils just builds fine [1].
I did not upgrade the compiler, however it might be that the any dependencies
were updated before the second (automated) build attempt.
Will keep an eye on the problem.
Adrian
> [1] http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=binutils&arch=sh4&ver=2.24.51.20140918-1&stamp=1411252127
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug target/43744] SH: Error: pcrel too far
[not found] <bug-43744-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2014-09-23 18:50 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
@ 2021-10-08 22:25 ` giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com
2021-10-08 22:26 ` giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com @ 2021-10-08 22:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43744
Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |giulio.benetti@benettiengin
| |eering.com
--- Comment #16 from Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com> ---
When building package gnuradio on buildroot we get this error:
```
[ 82%] Building CXX object
gr-digital/lib/CMakeFiles/gnuradio-digital.dir/correlate_access_code_bb_ts_impl.cc.o
/tmp/ccqgyzpD.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccqgyzpD.s:4751: Error: pcrel too far
gr-dtv/lib/CMakeFiles/gnuradio-dtv.dir/build.make:312: recipe for target
'gr-dtv/lib/CMakeFiles/gnuradio-dtv.dir/dvb/dvb_bbheader_bb_impl.cc.o' failed
```
This happens with sh4 shared gcc 9/10/11.
I could not find a work-around for it.
To reproduce the bug:
'''
# git clone git://git.busybox.net/buildroot
# wget https://git.busybox.net/buildroot-test/tree/utils/br-reproduce-build
- modify BASE_GIT=... with your buildroot path in br-reproduce-build then:
# chmod a+x br-reproduce-build
# ./br-reproduce-build 1db6c59c98e3c09fa13277076ee2fbe7967f1f6b
'''
Preprocessed files follow.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug target/43744] SH: Error: pcrel too far
[not found] <bug-43744-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2021-10-08 22:25 ` giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com
@ 2021-10-08 22:26 ` giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com
2021-10-08 22:27 ` giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com
2023-08-22 20:47 ` giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com
6 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com @ 2021-10-08 22:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43744
--- Comment #17 from Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com> ---
Created attachment 51574
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51574&action=edit
Pre-processed dvb_bbheader_bb_impl.cc.cpp(dvb_bbheader_bb_impl.cc.ii)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug target/43744] SH: Error: pcrel too far
[not found] <bug-43744-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2021-10-08 22:26 ` giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com
@ 2021-10-08 22:27 ` giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com
2023-08-22 20:47 ` giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com
6 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com @ 2021-10-08 22:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43744
--- Comment #18 from Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com> ---
Created attachment 51575
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51575&action=edit
Pre-processed dvb_bbheader_bb_impl.cc.cpp(dvb_bbheader_bb_impl.cc.s)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* [Bug target/43744] SH: Error: pcrel too far
[not found] <bug-43744-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2021-10-08 22:27 ` giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com
@ 2023-08-22 20:47 ` giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com
6 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com @ 2023-08-22 20:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43744
--- Comment #19 from Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com> ---
This bug still shows up with gcc 12.3.0. Can you please reopen it?
Thank you
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread