From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14228 invoked by alias); 6 May 2010 19:54:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 14124 invoked by uid 48); 6 May 2010 19:54:17 -0000 Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 19:54:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100506195417.14123.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug bootstrap/39150] Configure scripts have no 64-Bit Solaris defined (only i386-solaris*). In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-05/txt/msg00635.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #14 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-06 19:54 ------- > But what's the *point* of having such a configuration, except as a prove > of `we can do that'? Any actual problem that would be solved this way? Same as on Linux: the compiler will be faster and able to handle more memory. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39150