From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8241 invoked by alias); 6 May 2010 21:20:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 8195 invoked by uid 48); 6 May 2010 21:20:43 -0000 Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 21:20:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100506212043.8194.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/40949] FAIL: gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_7.f90 In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-05/txt/msg00644.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #8 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-06 21:20 ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Patch broke IA64 and was reverted (cf. 40969). Proper fix is PR 40976 which > should solve several of the remaining LTO problems as well. With the above statement, is this PR still needed? Can it be closed? -- dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |WAITING http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40949