* [Bug libfortran/21881] Array descriptors limit derived type sizes
[not found] <bug-21881-10391@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2006-10-21 17:39 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-01-05 14:12 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-10-21 17:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-21 17:39 -------
Thomas, isn't the 4.3 branching a good time to work on this? Would you have
time for that?
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21881
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [Bug libfortran/21881] Array descriptors limit derived type sizes
[not found] <bug-21881-10391@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2006-10-21 17:39 ` [Bug libfortran/21881] Array descriptors limit derived type sizes fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-01-05 14:12 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-09-14 11:31 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-01-05 14:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-05 14:12 -------
ping: Would you have either an example where this limit is encountered?
Wouldn't 4.3 be ideal for that work?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21881
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [Bug libfortran/21881] Array descriptors limit derived type sizes
[not found] <bug-21881-10391@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2006-10-21 17:39 ` [Bug libfortran/21881] Array descriptors limit derived type sizes fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-01-05 14:12 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-09-14 11:31 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-09-21 19:56 ` [Bug fortran/21881] ICE instead of error for large arrays in derived types fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-09-14 11:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-14 11:31 -------
I think this is related to the check in trans-types.c:
if (size && INTEGER_CST_P (size))
{
if (tree_int_cst_lt (gfc_max_array_element_size, size))
internal_error ("Array element size too big");
i += TREE_INT_CST_LOW (size) << GFC_DTYPE_SIZE_SHIFT;
}
dtype = build_int_cst (gfc_array_index_type, i);
which is triggered by code such as:
type t
integer i001(268435456)
end type t
type(t), allocatable :: x(:)
allocate(x(1))
print *, size(x)
print *, shape(x)
end
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21881
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/21881] ICE instead of error for large arrays in derived types
[not found] <bug-21881-10391@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2007-09-14 11:31 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-09-21 19:56 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-01 10:52 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-09-21 19:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-21 19:56 -------
For now, we should simply change the ICE into a standard error.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|enhancement |normal
Component|libfortran |fortran
Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code
Last reconfirmed|2005-12-28 06:36:10 |2007-09-21 19:56:35
date| |
Summary|Array descriptors limit |ICE instead of error for
|derived type sizes |large arrays in derived
| |types
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21881
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/21881] ICE instead of error for large arrays in derived types
[not found] <bug-21881-10391@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2007-09-21 19:56 ` [Bug fortran/21881] ICE instead of error for large arrays in derived types fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-10-01 10:52 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-12-08 18:06 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-10-01 10:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2007-09-21 19:56:35 |2007-10-01 10:52:19
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21881
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/21881] ICE instead of error for large arrays in derived types
[not found] <bug-21881-10391@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2007-10-01 10:52 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-12-08 18:06 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-12-16 19:38 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-12-08 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot|unassigned at gcc dot gnu
|org |dot org
Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21881
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/21881] ICE instead of error for large arrays in derived types
[not found] <bug-21881-10391@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2007-12-08 18:06 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-12-16 19:38 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-12-17 22:20 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-08 20:04 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-12-16 19:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-16 19:38 -------
I'll do this.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2007-10-01 10:52:19 |2007-12-16 19:38:41
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21881
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/21881] ICE instead of error for large arrays in derived types
[not found] <bug-21881-10391@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2007-12-16 19:38 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-12-17 22:20 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-08 20:04 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-12-17 22:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-17 22:20 -------
Changing this into a normal error leads to double
errors and assorted strangeness.
Unassigning myself for now.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot |unassigned at gcc dot gnu
|org |dot org
Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21881
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/21881] ICE instead of error for large arrays in derived types
[not found] <bug-21881-10391@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2007-12-17 22:20 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-05-08 20:04 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-05-08 20:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-08 20:04 -------
I expect, the array descriptor reform may make this fixable?!
--
dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn| |37577
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21881
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread