From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23040 invoked by alias); 12 May 2010 13:57:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 23006 invoked by uid 48); 12 May 2010 13:57:12 -0000 Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 13:57:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100512135712.23005.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c++/44097] 'export' is supposed to be no keyword in gcc, but in practice it is In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-05/txt/msg01266.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-05-12 13:57 ------- Well, one thing is *reserving* a keyword, another implementing a semantics. About the next Standard, yes it could make sense to drop it from the set of keywords, but I don't think we should rush to do that, certainly not in the obsolete, and not maintained anymore, 4.1.x branch ;) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44097