public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug inline-asm/43998] inline assembler: can't set clobbering for input register
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 07:11:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100514071049.14245.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-43998-17114@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>



------- Comment #12 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-05-14 07:10 -------
> the compiler may think that "something" do not modify eax. So next assignment
> may use eax ( mov eax, x ). So, "it does not make sense to have it as a
> clobber" is not correct. does not it ?

Andrew was saying that it doesn't make sense to consider input operands as
clobbered by an inline asm, generically.

> And the second, "Because the way the constraints are implemented inside GCC,
> an input constraint cannot overlap with a clobber." - It definitely the bug.

No, it isn't, it's clearly stated in the manual: "You may not write a clobber
description in a way that overlaps with an input or output operand."


-- 

ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43998


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-05-14  7:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-06  6:37 [Bug inline-asm/43998] New: " socketpair at gmail dot com
2010-05-06  7:11 ` [Bug inline-asm/43998] " ubizjak at gmail dot com
2010-05-06  8:07 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-06 11:00 ` socketpair at gmail dot com
2010-05-06 11:31 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-06 11:41 ` socketpair at gmail dot com
2010-05-06 13:09 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-05-06 13:42 ` socketpair at gmail dot com
2010-05-06 13:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-06 15:04 ` socketpair at gmail dot com
2010-05-14  2:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-14  6:31 ` socketpair at gmail dot com
2010-05-14  7:11 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
     [not found] <bug-43998-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2013-04-08  8:04 ` ilya.lesokhin at gmail dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100514071049.14245.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).