From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22320 invoked by alias); 14 May 2010 16:27:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 22267 invoked by uid 48); 14 May 2010 16:26:53 -0000 Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 16:27:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100514162653.22266.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug lto/44143] [4.6 Regression] -fdump-tree-all for lto does not work as expected In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-05/txt/msg01546.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-14 16:26 ------- Did it? > ./xgcc -B. -o t 1.c 2.c -flto -fdump-tree-optimized > ls t.142t.optimized 1.c.142t.optimized 2.c.142t.optimized 1.c.142t.optimized 2.c.142t.optimized t.142t.optimized or do you mean with -fwhopr? Yes, there it might have been - but I'd like to change 4.5 behavior there anyway. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|-fdump-tree-all for lto does|[4.6 Regression] -fdump- |not work as expected |tree-all for lto does not | |work as expected http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44143