From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21380 invoked by alias); 15 May 2010 01:31:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 21325 invoked by uid 48); 15 May 2010 01:31:21 -0000 Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 01:31:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100515013121.21324.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/44078] [4.6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/prefetch-7.c In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "hjl dot tools at gmail dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-05/txt/msg01587.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-05-15 01:31 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Created an attachment (id=20629) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20629&action=view) [edit] > Testfix for the prefetch-7.c testcase > > There always was > fprintf (dump_file, "Marked reference %p as a nontemporal store.\n", > in the old code. > > r159256 now adds > fprintf (dump_file, "Ignoring nontemporal store %p\n", (void *) ref); > > The testcase matches both messages, but it should only match the first one. > > So a potential fix might look like like the attachement. Can you confirm that > this patch fixes the testcase on your system? > This fixed the problem. Thanks. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44078