From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21856 invoked by alias); 22 May 2010 18:43:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 26806 invoked by uid 48); 22 May 2010 18:18:16 -0000 Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 18:43:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100522181816.26805.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c/43639] Missed optimization with complex long double In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-05/txt/msg02621.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #4 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:18 ------- This is deliberate, use -fno-signed-zeros to get the optimization you want with 4.5. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 24581 *** -- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43639