From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13390 invoked by alias); 24 May 2010 16:16:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 13297 invoked by uid 48); 24 May 2010 16:16:24 -0000 Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 16:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100524161624.13296.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug bootstrap/44255] [4.6 regression] gcc-4.6-20100522 bootstrap comparison failure on sparc64 and arm In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "mikpe at it dot uu dot se" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-05/txt/msg02763.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #4 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2010-05-24 16:16 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > most likely this is a duplicate of: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44229 > > and potentially an LE/BE issue given that it's not reported on *x86* However: 1. I see the failure on both BE (sparc64) and LE (armv5tel). 2. Both BE (powerpc64-linux) and LE (x86) don't see the failure. So I doubt it's an endianess issue. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44255