From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3139 invoked by alias); 30 May 2010 18:09:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 3110 invoked by uid 48); 30 May 2010 18:09:19 -0000 Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 18:09:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100530180919.3109.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/44334] rnflow.f90 ~27% slower with -fwhole-program -flto after revision 159852 In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-05/txt/msg03284.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-30 18:09 ------- Insufficient analysis. This more sounds like a dup of profile-estimate messed up by inlining. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|lto |fortran Summary|[4.6 Regression] rnflow.f90 |rnflow.f90 ~27% slower with |~27% slower with -fwhole- |-fwhole-program -flto after |program -flto after revision|revision 159852 |159852 | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44334