public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/42900] New: gfortran.dg/stat_[12].f90 may fail on NFS filesystems
@ 2010-01-29 20:11 ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-29 22:35 ` [Bug fortran/42900] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 more replies)
0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-01-29 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
I've noticed that all the gfortran.dg/stat_[12].f90 fail for me on all
platforms
(i.e. sparc-sun-solaris2, alpha-dec-osf, mips-sgi-irix).
FAIL: gfortran.dg/stat_1.f90 -O0 execution test
at all optimization levels. Running it under gdb reveals that it aborts here:
#4 0x000110f0 in MAIN__ ()
at /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/solaris/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/stat_1.f90:19
19 if (s1(6) /= getgid() .and. getgid() /= 0) call abort
Unfortunately, the test is bogus: at least on NFS with either the sgid bit set
on the parent directory or with the filesystem mounted with the grpid option,
newly created files are created with the gid of the directory, not the primary
group of the owner.
I don't know how best to fix this (maybe check if the file's group is in the
set of supplemental groups, if libgfortran supports getgroups).
--
Summary: gfortran.dg/stat_[12].f90 may fail on NFS filesystems
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42900
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/42900] gfortran.dg/stat_[12].f90 may fail on NFS filesystems
2010-01-29 20:11 [Bug fortran/42900] New: gfortran.dg/stat_[12].f90 may fail on NFS filesystems ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-01-29 22:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-01 9:21 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-01-29 22:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-29 22:35 -------
I'd say add a comment to the testcase and WONTFIX.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42900
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/42900] gfortran.dg/stat_[12].f90 may fail on NFS filesystems
2010-01-29 20:11 [Bug fortran/42900] New: gfortran.dg/stat_[12].f90 may fail on NFS filesystems ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-29 22:35 ` [Bug fortran/42900] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-02-01 9:21 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2010-03-01 12:26 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE @ 2010-02-01 9:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE 2010-02-01 09:21 -------
Subject: Re: gfortran.dg/stat_[12].f90 may fail on NFS filesystems
> ------- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-29 22:35 -------
> I'd say add a comment to the testcase and WONTFIX.
I don't think this is a good idea: this part of the testcase tests a
condition that doesn't necessarily hold, and is outside the control of
the testsuite. I'd rather remove that part of the test than have this
confusing noise in many reports.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42900
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/42900] gfortran.dg/stat_[12].f90 may fail on NFS filesystems
2010-01-29 20:11 [Bug fortran/42900] New: gfortran.dg/stat_[12].f90 may fail on NFS filesystems ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-29 22:35 ` [Bug fortran/42900] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-01 9:21 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
@ 2010-03-01 12:26 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-01 18:19 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-03-01 12:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-01 12:25 -------
Subject: Bug 42900
Author: ro
Date: Mon Mar 1 12:25:34 2010
New Revision: 157135
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157135
Log:
PR fortran/42900
* gfortran.dg/stat_1.f90: Accept 'testfile' gid == parent dir gid.
Explain this.
* gfortran.dg/stat_2.f90: Likewise.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/stat_1.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/stat_2.f90
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42900
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/42900] gfortran.dg/stat_[12].f90 may fail on NFS filesystems
2010-01-29 20:11 [Bug fortran/42900] New: gfortran.dg/stat_[12].f90 may fail on NFS filesystems ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2010-03-01 18:19 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-03-01 18:19 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-02 16:35 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-03-01 18:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-01 18:19 -------
Fixed for 4.5.0:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-02/msg00992.html
--
ro at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42900
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/42900] gfortran.dg/stat_[12].f90 may fail on NFS filesystems
2010-01-29 20:11 [Bug fortran/42900] New: gfortran.dg/stat_[12].f90 may fail on NFS filesystems ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-03-01 12:26 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-03-01 18:19 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-01 18:19 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-02 16:35 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-03-01 18:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-01 18:19 -------
Mine.
--
ro at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-03-01 18:19:00
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42900
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/42900] gfortran.dg/stat_[12].f90 may fail on NFS filesystems
2010-01-29 20:11 [Bug fortran/42900] New: gfortran.dg/stat_[12].f90 may fail on NFS filesystems ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2010-03-01 18:19 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-06-02 16:35 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-02 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-02 16:35 -------
Subject: Bug 42900
Author: ro
Date: Wed Jun 2 16:35:15 2010
New Revision: 160161
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=160161
Log:
Backport from mainline:
2010-03-01 Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
PR fortran/42900
* gfortran.dg/stat_1.f90: Accept 'testfile' gid == parent dir gid.
Explain this.
* gfortran.dg/stat_2.f90: Likewise.
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/stat_1.f90
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/stat_2.f90
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42900
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-06-02 16:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-01-29 20:11 [Bug fortran/42900] New: gfortran.dg/stat_[12].f90 may fail on NFS filesystems ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-29 22:35 ` [Bug fortran/42900] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-01 9:21 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2010-03-01 12:26 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-01 18:19 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-01 18:19 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-02 16:35 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).