From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2174 invoked by alias); 2 Jun 2010 20:59:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 2110 invoked by uid 48); 2 Jun 2010 20:59:34 -0000 Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 20:59:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100602205934.2109.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug bootstrap/43170] gcc 4.5 20100218 bootstrap compare fails on os x 10.6 In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-06/txt/msg00274.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #55 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-06-02 20:59 ------- > and on D10 - no @ stage1 (correct) I see [macbook] gcc/build_w% grep -i tls stage1-x86_64-apple-darwin10.3.0/libgomp/config.log | #define HAVE_TLS 1 | #define HAVE_TLS 1 | #define HAVE_TLS 1 | #define HAVE_TLS 1 gcc_cv_have_tls=yes #define HAVE_TLS 1 [macbook] gcc/build_w% grep -i tls stage1-x86_64-apple-darwin10.3.0/i386/libgomp/config.log | #define HAVE_TLS 1 | #define HAVE_TLS 1 | #define HAVE_TLS 1 | #define HAVE_TLS 1 gcc_cv_have_tls=yes #define HAVE_TLS 1 > so... something is not right with one or the other.. and it looks like it's the > x86_64 that's dodgy. I hope I don't have any leftover from previous patches!-) I think so, but I may have missed something. > The better news is that the 'proper' fix @PR44132 does ;) I have applied the 'proper' fix, the number of failures under load has been reduced from ~1/3 to ~1/2000, but still nonzero!-( > (but there is still one "TODO" on that). and I see the TODO: FAIL: gcc.dg/tls/asm-1.c (internal compiler error) FAIL: gcc.dg/tls/asm-1.c (test for errors, line 7) FAIL: gcc.dg/tls/asm-1.c (test for excess errors) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43170