From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18563 invoked by alias); 6 Jun 2010 15:53:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 18469 invoked by uid 48); 6 Jun 2010 15:53:41 -0000 Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2010 15:53:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100606155341.18468.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug other/44435] gengtype: don't test undefined value after vasprintf failure In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-06/txt/msg00652.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #2 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-06 15:53 ------- If the libiberty maintainers won't review the xvasprintf patch, perhaps a global reviewer could do so? That would be better than fiddling with local checks. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-11/msg01448.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-11/msg01449.html -- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|c |other http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44435