From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2181 invoked by alias); 6 Jun 2010 20:52:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 2154 invoked by uid 48); 6 Jun 2010 20:52:36 -0000 Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2010 20:52:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100606205236.2153.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/44430] [4.5/4.6 Regression] Infinite recursion with -fdump-parse-tree In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-06/txt/msg00668.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #4 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-06 20:52 ------- I agree. Rev. 149586 is: 2009-07-13 Janus Weil PR fortran/40646 * module.c (mio_symbol): If the symbol has formal arguments, the formal namespace will be present. * resolve.c (resolve_actual_arglist): Correctly handle 'called' procedure pointer components as actual arguments. (resolve_fl_derived,resolve_symbol): Make sure the formal namespace is present. * trans-expr.c (gfc_conv_procedure_call): Correctly handle the formal arguments of procedure pointer components. (nothing else suspicious in that range. Janus? -- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |janus at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44430