From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7297 invoked by alias); 7 Jun 2010 20:18:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 6541 invoked by alias); 7 Jun 2010 20:17:45 -0000 Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 20:18:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100607201745.6540.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug other/44435] gengtype: don't test undefined value after vasprintf failure In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "joseph at codesourcery dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-06/txt/msg00785.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-06-07 20:17 ------- Subject: Re: gengtype: don't test undefined value after vasprintf failure On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, dj at redhat dot com wrote: > > If the libiberty maintainers won't review the xvasprintf patch, > > I did: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-08/msg00589.html That's a review of an older version. The URLs I gave were of a version a different person updated to take account of your original review comments. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44435