* [Bug lto/44464] ICE during linux kernel whopr build
2010-06-08 9:05 [Bug lto/44464] New: ICE during linux kernel whopr build andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
@ 2010-06-08 9:39 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
2010-06-08 9:40 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
` (21 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org @ 2010-06-08 9:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2010-06-08 09:38 -------
Ok unable to attach and I've been told reporting LTO bugs requires some magic
voodoo incarnations first.
If it helps here's the gdb information of the crash:
(gdb) pt var
<error_mark 0x1200022>
(gdb) bt
#0 var_map_base_init (map=0x1102b00) at ../../gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-live.c:87
#1 0x00000000007248fb in coalesce_ssa_name ()
at ../../gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-coalesce.c:1405
#2 0x00000000006fd30f in rewrite_out_of_ssa (sa=0x10540a0)
at ../../gcc/gcc/tree-outof-ssa.c:909
#3 0x00000000004d46d8 in gimple_expand_cfg ()
at ../../gcc/gcc/cfgexpand.c:3742
#4 0x000000000062afd1 in execute_one_pass (pass=0xf503e0)
at ../../gcc/gcc/passes.c:1576
#5 0x0000000000fe28e0 in ?? ()
#6 0x010000000062aeb4 in ?? ()
#7 0x0000000000f503e0 in ?? ()
#8 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
(gdb)
Somehow "error_mark" got in there.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44464
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/44464] ICE during linux kernel whopr build
2010-06-08 9:05 [Bug lto/44464] New: ICE during linux kernel whopr build andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
2010-06-08 9:39 ` [Bug lto/44464] " andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
@ 2010-06-08 9:40 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
2010-06-08 9:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (20 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org @ 2010-06-08 9:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2010-06-08 09:40 -------
The object files are at http://halobates.de/whopr-ice.tar.bz2
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44464
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/44464] ICE during linux kernel whopr build
2010-06-08 9:05 [Bug lto/44464] New: ICE during linux kernel whopr build andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
2010-06-08 9:39 ` [Bug lto/44464] " andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
2010-06-08 9:40 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
@ 2010-06-08 9:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-09 10:56 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
` (19 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-08 9:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-08 09:55 -------
Did you reduce the number of object files already? Note that you are linking
without optimization (and you probably built the .o files with optimization?)
So this might be a duplicate of PR41159.
Can you put output of adding -v to one of the .o file compiles? Can you
put preprocessed source of all .o file sources that are required to reproduce
the bug somewhere?
Thx.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Keywords| |lto
Version|lto |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44464
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/44464] ICE during linux kernel whopr build
2010-06-08 9:05 [Bug lto/44464] New: ICE during linux kernel whopr build andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-06-08 9:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-06-09 10:56 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
2010-06-09 10:56 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
` (18 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org @ 2010-06-09 10:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2010-06-09 10:56 -------
Created an attachment (id=20875)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20875&action=view)
reduced input file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44464
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/44464] ICE during linux kernel whopr build
2010-06-08 9:05 [Bug lto/44464] New: ICE during linux kernel whopr build andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2010-06-09 10:56 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
@ 2010-06-09 10:56 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
2010-06-09 11:22 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
` (17 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org @ 2010-06-09 10:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2010-06-09 10:55 -------
I was told that the whopr link step would inherit the optimization
flags from the build step. Is that not true?
Here's a reduced test case with only a single input file (reduced too)
gcc46 -O2 -fwhopr -c igmp.mini.i
gcc46 -r -fwhopr igmp.mini.o
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44464
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/44464] ICE during linux kernel whopr build
2010-06-08 9:05 [Bug lto/44464] New: ICE during linux kernel whopr build andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2010-06-09 10:56 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
@ 2010-06-09 11:22 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
2010-06-09 12:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (16 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org @ 2010-06-09 11:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44464
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/44464] ICE during linux kernel whopr build
2010-06-08 9:05 [Bug lto/44464] New: ICE during linux kernel whopr build andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2010-06-09 11:22 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
@ 2010-06-09 12:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-09 12:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (15 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-09 12:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-09 12:08 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> I was told that the whopr link step would inherit the optimization
> flags from the build step. Is that not true?
That's not true.
> Here's a reduced test case with only a single input file (reduced too)
>
> gcc46 -O2 -fwhopr -c igmp.mini.i
> gcc46 -r -fwhopr igmp.mini.o
Thanks.
Confirmed (also with -flto).
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x0000000000a196e8 in var_map_base_init (map=0x16479c0)
at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/tree-ssa-live.c:87
87 if (!ann->base_var_processed)
(gdb) p ann
$1 = (var_ann_t) 0x0
probably not too hard to track down. The decl is a PARM_DECL and not
registered with referenced vars.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-06-09 12:08:51
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44464
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/44464] ICE during linux kernel whopr build
2010-06-08 9:05 [Bug lto/44464] New: ICE during linux kernel whopr build andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2010-06-09 12:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-06-09 12:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-09 12:16 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-09 12:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-09 12:15 -------
Actually - we seem to get IPA SRA parm repacements done but the original
parameter SSA names are not released.
(gdb) call debug_function (cfun->decl, 0)
igmp_mc_get_next (<unnamed type> * ISRA.14, struct ip_mc_list * ISRA.15)
{
struct ip_mc_list * im;
(gdb) call debug_generic_expr ($5)
im_1
Martin - can you have a look?
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot |unassigned at gcc dot gnu
|org |dot org
Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44464
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/44464] ICE during linux kernel whopr build
2010-06-08 9:05 [Bug lto/44464] New: ICE during linux kernel whopr build andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2010-06-09 12:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-06-09 12:16 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
2010-06-09 12:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org @ 2010-06-09 12:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2010-06-09 12:16 -------
Unfortunate. Fixing that in the makefiles would be major effort for all the -f
and -m flags, which sometimes vary by target.
I thought LTO was designed to minimize makefile changes?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44464
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/44464] ICE during linux kernel whopr build
2010-06-08 9:05 [Bug lto/44464] New: ICE during linux kernel whopr build andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2010-06-09 12:16 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
@ 2010-06-09 12:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-09 12:18 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-09 12:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-09 12:16 -------
CC'ing martin even.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44464
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/44464] ICE during linux kernel whopr build
2010-06-08 9:05 [Bug lto/44464] New: ICE during linux kernel whopr build andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2010-06-09 12:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-06-09 12:18 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
2010-06-09 13:01 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org @ 2010-06-09 12:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2010-06-09 12:18 -------
The tree input that leads to the NULL annotation is a "error_mark"
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44464
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/44464] ICE during linux kernel whopr build
2010-06-08 9:05 [Bug lto/44464] New: ICE during linux kernel whopr build andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2010-06-09 12:18 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
@ 2010-06-09 13:01 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-09 13:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-09 13:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-09 13:01 -------
(In reply to comment #10)
> The tree input that leads to the NULL annotation is a "error_mark"
Not for me.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44464
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/44464] ICE during linux kernel whopr build
2010-06-08 9:05 [Bug lto/44464] New: ICE during linux kernel whopr build andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2010-06-09 13:01 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-06-09 13:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-09 13:35 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-09 13:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-09 13:03 -------
(In reply to comment #9)
> Unfortunate. Fixing that in the makefiles would be major effort for all the -f
> and -m flags, which sometimes vary by target.
>
> I thought LTO was designed to minimize makefile changes?
Yes.
But you want to be able to have different optimizations at compile/link time.
Also we would need to start on how to automagically merge different settings
at compile-time ...
Well - option handling is still an awkward area.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44464
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/44464] ICE during linux kernel whopr build
2010-06-08 9:05 [Bug lto/44464] New: ICE during linux kernel whopr build andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2010-06-09 13:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-06-09 13:35 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
2010-06-09 13:42 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org @ 2010-06-09 13:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #13 from andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2010-06-09 13:35 -------
What happens then when some files need different options that other files?
This sounds more and more like a showstopper if you're right.
I was not prepared to redesign the Makefiles
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44464
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/44464] ICE during linux kernel whopr build
2010-06-08 9:05 [Bug lto/44464] New: ICE during linux kernel whopr build andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2010-06-09 13:35 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
@ 2010-06-09 13:42 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
2010-06-09 13:56 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org @ 2010-06-09 13:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #14 from andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2010-06-09 13:42 -------
I found this code in lto.c which seems to disagree:
/* Read the options saved from each file in the command line. Called
from lang_hooks.post_options which is called by process_options
right before all the options are used to initialize the compiler.
This assumes that decode_options has already run, so the
num_in_fnames and in_fnames are properly set.
Note that this assumes that all the files had been compiled with
the same options, which is not a good assumption. In general,
options ought to be read from all the files in the set and merged.
However, it is still unclear what the merge rules should be. */
void
lto_read_all_file_options (void)
Still remains to be seen if it DTRT though (e.g. for -pg vs no -pg)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44464
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/44464] ICE during linux kernel whopr build
2010-06-08 9:05 [Bug lto/44464] New: ICE during linux kernel whopr build andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2010-06-09 13:42 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
@ 2010-06-09 13:56 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
2010-06-10 13:21 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org @ 2010-06-09 13:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #15 from andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2010-06-09 13:55 -------
Ok seems it does not do what I want:
FIXME lto. Currently the scheme is limited in that only the
options saved on the first object file (f1.o) are read back during
the link step. This means that the options used to compile f1.o
will be applied to ALL the object files in the final link step.
More work needs to be done to implement a merging and validation
mechanism, as this will not be enough for all cases. */
Anyways OT for this bug, maybe needs a new one?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44464
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/44464] ICE during linux kernel whopr build
2010-06-08 9:05 [Bug lto/44464] New: ICE during linux kernel whopr build andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2010-06-09 13:56 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
@ 2010-06-10 13:21 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
2010-06-10 13:22 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org @ 2010-06-10 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #16 from andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2010-06-10 13:20 -------
I reduced another of my ICEs from this build and it's in the same place.
(gdb) bt
#0 var_map_base_init (map=0x10abe60) at ../../gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-live.c:87
#1 0x00000000007248fb in coalesce_ssa_name () at
../../gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-coalesce.c:1405
...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44464
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/44464] ICE during linux kernel whopr build
2010-06-08 9:05 [Bug lto/44464] New: ICE during linux kernel whopr build andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2010-06-10 13:21 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
@ 2010-06-10 13:22 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
2010-06-11 16:49 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org @ 2010-06-10 13:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #17 from andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2010-06-10 13:21 -------
Created an attachment (id=20882)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20882&action=view)
other test case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44464
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/44464] ICE during linux kernel whopr build
2010-06-08 9:05 [Bug lto/44464] New: ICE during linux kernel whopr build andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2010-06-10 13:22 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
@ 2010-06-11 16:49 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-11 17:09 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-11 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #18 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-11 16:49 -------
When I tried the LTO step in any of the two testcases I got:
jamborm@tuc:~/gcc/mine/test/pr44464$ ~/gcc/inst/mine/bin/gcc -r -fwhopr
igmp.mini.o
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc_s
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
What am I doing wrong? (And what does the -r switch, I can't find it
in the documentation)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44464
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/44464] ICE during linux kernel whopr build
2010-06-08 9:05 [Bug lto/44464] New: ICE during linux kernel whopr build andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
2010-06-11 16:49 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-06-11 17:09 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
2010-06-15 11:09 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org @ 2010-06-11 17:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #19 from andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2010-06-11 17:09 -------
Sorry you need -nostdlib too (forgot that)
-r is immediate linking
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44464
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/44464] ICE during linux kernel whopr build
2010-06-08 9:05 [Bug lto/44464] New: ICE during linux kernel whopr build andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
` (19 preceding siblings ...)
2010-06-11 17:09 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
@ 2010-06-15 11:09 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-16 17:01 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-16 17:02 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-15 11:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #20 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-15 11:09 -------
Subject: Bug 44464
Author: jamborm
Date: Tue Jun 15 11:09:12 2010
New Revision: 160777
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=160777
Log:
2010-06-15 Martin Jambor <mjambor@suse.cz>
PR lto/44464
* tree-sra.c (replace_removed_params_ssa_names): Call release_ssa_name
on the newly dead SSA name.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/tree-sra.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44464
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/44464] ICE during linux kernel whopr build
2010-06-08 9:05 [Bug lto/44464] New: ICE during linux kernel whopr build andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
` (20 preceding siblings ...)
2010-06-15 11:09 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-06-16 17:01 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-16 17:02 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-16 17:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #21 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-16 17:01 -------
Subject: Bug 44464
Author: jamborm
Date: Wed Jun 16 17:01:06 2010
New Revision: 160852
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=160852
Log:
2010-06-15 Martin Jambor <mjambor@suse.cz>
PR lto/44464
* tree-sra.c (replace_removed_params_ssa_names): Call release_ssa_name
on the newly dead SSA name.
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/gcc/tree-sra.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44464
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug lto/44464] ICE during linux kernel whopr build
2010-06-08 9:05 [Bug lto/44464] New: ICE during linux kernel whopr build andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
` (21 preceding siblings ...)
2010-06-16 17:01 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-06-16 17:02 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
22 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-16 17:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #22 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-16 17:02 -------
This is now fixed on both the trunk and the 4.5 branch.
--
jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44464
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread