From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16897 invoked by alias); 10 Jun 2010 09:48:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 16186 invoked by uid 48); 10 Jun 2010 09:47:49 -0000 Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 09:48:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100610094749.16180.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/44492] auto-inc-dec pushes PRE_MODIFY/PRE_INC into inline asm operands In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-06/txt/msg01137.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-10 09:47 ------- I think the real issue is that m is too generic from the point of the documentation. Reading: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.5.0/gcc/Simple-Constraints.html#Simple-Constraints Makes it sound like it could accept an auto increment/decrement pattern. While using something like "o" would not. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44492