From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3115 invoked by alias); 11 Jun 2010 10:53:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 3041 invoked by uid 48); 11 Jun 2010 10:53:43 -0000 Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 10:53:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100611105343.3040.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c++/44499] No default constructor available In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "manu at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-06/txt/msg01271.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #3 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-11 10:53 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > gcc is correct, accepting the code previously was a bug that was fixed recently > > You need to provide an initializer for g_d This sort of changes should be documented in the changes.html page or in porting_to.html -- manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44499