From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23304 invoked by alias); 13 Jun 2010 16:47:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 23256 invoked by uid 48); 13 Jun 2010 16:47:38 -0000 Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 16:47:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100613164738.23255.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug inline-asm/44527] improve diagnostics in inline assembly In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-06/txt/msg01473.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-13 16:47 ------- Hmm, with a newer binutils we get a better error message: t.c: Assembler messages: t.c:2: Error: no such instruction: `frob %eax' -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|c |inline-asm http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44527