From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21767 invoked by alias); 13 Jun 2010 17:18:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 21726 invoked by uid 48); 13 Jun 2010 17:18:27 -0000 Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 17:18:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100613171827.21725.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug inline-asm/44527] improve diagnostics in inline assembly In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-06/txt/msg01483.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-13 17:18 ------- >The column information is wrong. What column information :). >The diagnostic markers are inconsistent (Error versus error). Report that to the binutils project. >This depends on the gnu assembler, which is not the default in many places. Yes and that is on purpose. It is up to the assembler to get it right not GCC. We don't control the assembler and we should not be looking into the inline-asm to report an error except for constraints violations. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44527