public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/44515] New: improve message for missing ";" @ 2010-06-13 12:44 manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-13 17:26 ` [Bug c/44515] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (3 more replies) 0 siblings, 4 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: manu at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-13 12:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs [-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --] [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 609 bytes --] Testcase: void bar(void); void foo(void) { bar() } gcc-4.6: clang-3.c:7:1: error: expected ; before } token clang: t.c:4:8: error: expected ';' after expression bar() ^ ; -- Summary: improve message for missing ";" Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: manu at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44515 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/44515] improve message for missing ";" 2010-06-13 12:44 [Bug c/44515] New: improve message for missing ";" manu at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-13 17:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-13 17:33 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-13 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-13 17:25 ------- Actually before is more correct than saying after bar(). Because expressions don't need to end on the same line. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |enhancement http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44515 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/44515] improve message for missing ";" 2010-06-13 12:44 [Bug c/44515] New: improve message for missing ";" manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-13 17:26 ` [Bug c/44515] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-13 17:33 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-13 18:25 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-06-13 19:33 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: manu at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-13 17:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #2 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-13 17:33 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Actually before is more correct than saying after bar(). Because expressions > don't need to end on the same line. I wonder why people tend to write: bar(); rather than ;} Obviously the second is more correct. ;-) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44515 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/44515] improve message for missing ";" 2010-06-13 12:44 [Bug c/44515] New: improve message for missing ";" manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-13 17:26 ` [Bug c/44515] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-13 17:33 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-13 18:25 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-06-13 19:33 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: joseph at codesourcery dot com @ 2010-06-13 18:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-06-13 18:25 ------- Subject: Re: improve message for missing ";" Perhaps "between expression and '}' token" would be more precise. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44515 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/44515] improve message for missing ";" 2010-06-13 12:44 [Bug c/44515] New: improve message for missing ";" manu at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2010-06-13 18:25 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com @ 2010-06-13 19:33 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: manu at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-13 19:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #4 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-13 19:33 ------- Perhaps, but the location should be at the end of the expression, where most programmers would put the ';'. Then, mentioning '}', which may be in a totally different line with a lot comments in between, would be confusing. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44515 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <bug-44515-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>]
* [Bug c/44515] improve message for missing ";" [not found] <bug-44515-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> @ 2011-01-18 0:11 ` nicola at gcc dot gnu.org 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: nicola at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-18 0:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44515 Nicola Pero <nicola at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicola at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 from Nicola Pero <nicola at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-17 23:34:31 UTC --- I like Joseph's suggestion - I had been thinking for a while about the C/ObjC FE error messages and came to the same conclusion: ideally it should prominently mention the last valid token (that's how you think about the error, the code is valid until "bar()", then there is an error), but also mentioning the next, unexpected token helps you find the error location when you're looking at the code. So, shall we go for error: missing ‘;’ after expression and before ‘}’ then ? I guess we'd need to change all the errors in sync. Thanks ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-01-17 23:34 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2010-06-13 12:44 [Bug c/44515] New: improve message for missing ";" manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-13 17:26 ` [Bug c/44515] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-13 17:33 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-13 18:25 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-06-13 19:33 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org [not found] <bug-44515-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2011-01-18 0:11 ` nicola at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).