From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28567 invoked by alias); 13 Jun 2010 17:30:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 28519 invoked by uid 48); 13 Jun 2010 17:30:12 -0000 Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 17:30:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100613173012.28518.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug inline-asm/44527] improve diagnostics in inline assembly In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "manu at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-06/txt/msg01487.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #6 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-13 17:30 ------- This column information: t.c:2:11: note: generated from here __asm__ ("frob %0" : "+r" (X)); ^ I am not going to get into a reopen war with you anyway. I am just trying to make a list of the diagnostic issues where LLVM claims superiority to GCC. There are a lot, so I guess one more or less doesn't make much difference. http://blog.llvm.org/2010/04/intro-to-llvm-mc-project.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44527