From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24082 invoked by alias); 21 Jun 2010 16:20:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 23953 invoked by uid 48); 21 Jun 2010 16:20:16 -0000 Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 16:20:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100621162016.23952.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c++/44611] Including and hides ::signbit function In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "gnu at bluedreamer dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-06/txt/msg02066.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #11 from gnu at bluedreamer dot com 2010-06-21 16:20 ------- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > Are these still relevant for c++0x? More so section 5 which says if they are > > macros in C they must be macros in C++ > > see 26.8 [c.math] paragraph 11 Thanks. I should probably start using the draft rather then my dusty old 14882 copy. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44611