From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30400 invoked by alias); 21 Jun 2010 17:44:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 30240 invoked by uid 48); 21 Jun 2010 17:44:00 -0000 Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 17:44:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100621174400.30239.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/41137] inefficient zeroing of an array In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-06/txt/msg02086.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #11 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-21 17:43 ------- What's the reason why gfc_trans_zero_assign insists that len is INTEGER_CST? At least if it is contiguous (and not assumed size), why can't memset be used even for non-constant sizes? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41137