From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32643 invoked by alias); 24 Jun 2010 11:52:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 31911 invoked by uid 48); 24 Jun 2010 11:51:30 -0000 Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 11:52:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100624115130.31909.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-06/txt/msg02341.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-24 11:51 ------- note->type == 10 is: *d = '\n'; /* A sentinel note that should never be processed. */ add_line_note (buffer, d + 1, '\n'); buffer->next_line = s + 1; created. But, as this PR lacks a testcase (well, the testcase depends on a proprietary header file not included here), it is hard to guess what's going on. Can you see if doing just cp /usr/include/stdlib.h /tmp/stdlib.h gcc -E -traditional-cpp /tmp/stdlib.h If yes, can you distill a smaller testcase from it (ideally at most a few lines)? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213