From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8499 invoked by alias); 24 Jun 2010 17:58:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 8383 invoked by uid 48); 24 Jun 2010 17:58:35 -0000 Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 17:58:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100624175835.8382.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/12392] very long optimized compile In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-06/txt/msg02372.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #32 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-24 17:58 ------- I don't see how a bug reported in 2003 against 3.2 and marked as failing up to 4.0 could possibly be related in any way with VTA. Clearly that bug was fixed. Sure, VTA does perform poorly with these testcases, but this is not the bug that was reported, and we already have other bugs about VTA performance. -- aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |blocker http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12392