From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32348 invoked by alias); 25 Jun 2010 04:42:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 32306 invoked by uid 48); 25 Jun 2010 04:42:46 -0000 Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 04:42:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100625044246.32305.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/44660] [regression 4.4/4.5/4.6] ICE in resolve_equivalence() In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-06/txt/msg02418.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-25 04:42 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Confirmed. I came up with the exact same patch and it does pass regression > testing, of course. Collided when I tried to post this. :) > :) The mangled Fortran code caught my eye. I'm actually wondering where Sebastian found this gem. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44660