* [Bug middle-end/44592] [4.5/4.6 Regression] wrong code at -O3
2010-06-19 17:17 [Bug fortran/44592] New: [4.5/4.6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
@ 2010-06-19 19:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-24 21:58 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-19 19:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|rguenther at suse dot de |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44592
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/44592] [4.5/4.6 Regression] wrong code at -O3
2010-06-19 17:17 [Bug fortran/44592] New: [4.5/4.6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-06-19 19:05 ` [Bug middle-end/44592] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-06-24 21:58 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-25 3:38 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (9 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-24 21:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-24 21:58 -------
Fails also at -O2 -funroll-loops.
I can't see anything wrong with the tree-level code.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Keywords| |wrong-code
Priority|P3 |P2
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-06-24 21:58:27
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44592
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/44592] [4.5/4.6 Regression] wrong code at -O3
2010-06-19 17:17 [Bug fortran/44592] New: [4.5/4.6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-06-19 19:05 ` [Bug middle-end/44592] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-24 21:58 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-06-25 3:38 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-06-25 11:27 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2010-06-25 3:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-06-25 03:38 -------
It is caused by revision 152236:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-09/msg00987.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |matz at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44592
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/44592] [4.5/4.6 Regression] wrong code at -O3
2010-06-19 17:17 [Bug fortran/44592] New: [4.5/4.6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-06-25 3:38 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2010-06-25 11:27 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-25 15:34 ` matz at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-25 11:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-25 11:26 -------
This goes wrong with -O2 -funroll-loops already during tree opts. In vrp2 we
have:
b[2][1]{lb: 1 sz: 1} = D.1599_148;
b[3][1]{lb: 1 sz: 1} = D.1599_154;
D.1635_152 = 2;
D.1636_151 = &b[2][1]{lb: 1 sz: 1};
D.1637_146 = 3;
D.1638_145 = &b[3][1]{lb: 1 sz: 1};
__builtin_memcpy (D.1638_145, D.1636_151, 1);
...
D.1647_84 = b[3][1]{lb: 1 sz: 1};
D.1648_85 = A.5[3];
D.1649_86 = (*D.1648_85)[1]{lb: 1 sz: 1};
if (D.1647_84 != D.1649_86)
but in dom2:
b[2][1]{lb: 1 sz: 1} = D.1599_148;
b[3][1]{lb: 1 sz: 1} = D.1599_154;
D.1635_152 = 2;
D.1636_151 = &b[2][1]{lb: 1 sz: 1};
D.1637_146 = 3;
D.1638_145 = &b[3][1]{lb: 1 sz: 1};
D.1680_170 = b[2][1]{lb: 1 sz: 1};
b[3][1]{lb: 1 sz: 1} = D.1680_170;
...
D.1647_84 = D.1599_154;
D.1648_85 = A.5[3];
D.1649_86 = (*D.1648_85)[1]{lb: 1 sz: 1};
if (D.1649_86 != D.1599_154)
b[3] at that point isn't D.1599_154 though, but D.1599_148 (== D.1680_170).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44592
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/44592] [4.5/4.6 Regression] wrong code at -O3
2010-06-19 17:17 [Bug fortran/44592] New: [4.5/4.6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2010-06-25 11:27 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-06-25 15:34 ` matz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-28 15:14 ` matz at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: matz at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-25 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from matz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-25 15:34 -------
Indeed. Mine.
--
matz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |matz at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2010-06-24 21:58:27 |2010-06-25 15:34:24
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44592
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/44592] [4.5/4.6 Regression] wrong code at -O3
2010-06-19 17:17 [Bug fortran/44592] New: [4.5/4.6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2010-06-25 15:34 ` matz at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-06-28 15:14 ` matz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-28 15:16 ` [Bug middle-end/44592] [4.5 " matz at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: matz at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-28 15:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from matz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-28 15:14 -------
Subject: Bug 44592
Author: matz
Date: Mon Jun 28 15:14:31 2010
New Revision: 161496
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=161496
Log:
PR middle-end/44592
* gimple-fold.c (gimplify_and_update_call_from_tree): Maintain
proper VDEF chain for intermediate stores in the sequence.
testsuite/
PR middle-end/44592
* gfortran.dg/pr44592.f90: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr44592.f90
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/gimple-fold.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44592
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/44592] [4.5 Regression] wrong code at -O3
2010-06-19 17:17 [Bug fortran/44592] New: [4.5/4.6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2010-06-28 15:14 ` matz at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-06-28 15:16 ` matz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-28 20:42 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
` (4 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: matz at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-28 15:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from matz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-28 15:16 -------
Fixed for 4.6, waiting a bit for 4.5.
--
matz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[4.5/4.6 Regression] wrong |[4.5 Regression] wrong code
|code at -O3 |at -O3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44592
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/44592] [4.5 Regression] wrong code at -O3
2010-06-19 17:17 [Bug fortran/44592] New: [4.5/4.6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2010-06-28 15:16 ` [Bug middle-end/44592] [4.5 " matz at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-06-28 20:42 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-07-01 12:16 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
` (3 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr @ 2010-06-28 20:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-06-28 20:42 -------
> Fixed for 4.6, waiting a bit for 4.5.
Revision 161496 caused pr44699.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44592
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/44592] [4.5 Regression] wrong code at -O3
2010-06-19 17:17 [Bug fortran/44592] New: [4.5/4.6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2010-06-28 20:42 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
@ 2010-07-01 12:16 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-07-01 12:21 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr @ 2010-07-01 12:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-07-01 12:16 -------
> > Fixed for 4.6, waiting a bit for 4.5.
>
> Revision 161496 caused pr44699.
I think the PRINTs are of no use in the testsuite for gfortran.dg/pr44592.f90.
I'ld suggest to apply the following patch:
--- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr44592.f90 2010-06-28
17:51:41.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr44592.f90 2010-07-01 14:12:38.000000000
+0200
@@ -13,8 +13,5 @@
b(4:2:-1)(i:i) = b(3:1:-1)(i:i)
! This fails. If the condition is printed, the result is F F F F
- if (any (b .ne. (/"1","1","2","3"/))) i = 2
- print *, b
- print *, b .ne. (/"1","1","2","3"/)
- if (i == 2) call abort
+ if (any (b .ne. (/"1","1","2","3"/))) call abort
end
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44592
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/44592] [4.5 Regression] wrong code at -O3
2010-06-19 17:17 [Bug fortran/44592] New: [4.5/4.6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-01 12:16 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
@ 2010-07-01 12:21 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-01 13:18 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-07-31 9:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
11 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-07-01 12:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-01 12:21 -------
The important question is if the testcase still ICEs with the fix reverted when
you do that change.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44592
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/44592] [4.5 Regression] wrong code at -O3
2010-06-19 17:17 [Bug fortran/44592] New: [4.5/4.6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-01 12:21 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-07-01 13:18 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-07-31 9:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
11 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr @ 2010-07-01 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-07-01 13:18 -------
> The important question is if the testcase still ICEs with the fix reverted when
> you do that change.
The test aborts with revisions before 161496.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44592
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/44592] [4.5 Regression] wrong code at -O3
2010-06-19 17:17 [Bug fortran/44592] New: [4.5/4.6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-01 13:18 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
@ 2010-07-31 9:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
11 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-07-31 9:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-31 09:29 -------
GCC 4.5.1 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.5.1 |4.5.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44592
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/44592] [4.5 Regression] wrong code at -O3
[not found] <bug-44592-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2010-10-10 19:36 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2010-10-10 20:04 ` rguenther at suse dot de
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2010-10-10 19:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44592
--- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2010-10-10 19:36:15 UTC ---
What are the plans with is pr? Will it be back-ported to 4.5?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/44592] [4.5 Regression] wrong code at -O3
[not found] <bug-44592-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2010-10-10 19:36 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2010-10-10 20:04 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2010-11-14 11:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: rguenther at suse dot de @ 2010-10-10 20:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44592
--- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> 2010-10-10 20:03:30 UTC ---
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44592
>
> --- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2010-10-10 19:36:15 UTC ---
> What are the plans with is pr? Will it be back-ported to 4.5?
There were various fallouts of the fix, including one fixed only
last week. But yes, a backport might eventually happen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/44592] [4.5 Regression] wrong code at -O3
[not found] <bug-44592-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2010-10-10 19:36 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2010-10-10 20:04 ` rguenther at suse dot de
@ 2010-11-14 11:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-16 13:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-11-14 11:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44592
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|matz at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #14 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-14 11:47:55 UTC ---
I will look at backporting the 4.6 variant.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/44592] [4.5 Regression] wrong code at -O3
[not found] <bug-44592-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-11-14 11:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-12-16 13:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-17 11:39 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-17 11:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-12-16 13:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44592
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.5.2 |4.5.3
--- Comment #15 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-12-16 13:03:16 UTC ---
GCC 4.5.2 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/44592] [4.5 Regression] wrong code at -O3
[not found] <bug-44592-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2010-12-16 13:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-01-17 11:39 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-17 11:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-17 11:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44592
--- Comment #16 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-17 11:31:14 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jan 17 11:31:10 2011
New Revision: 168894
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168894
Log:
2011-01-17 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
Backport from mainline
PR tree-optimization/47286
* tree-ssa-structalias.c (new_var_info): Register variables
are global.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr47286.c: New testcase.
PR tree-optimization/44592
* tree-ssa-ccp.c (gimplify_and_update_call_from_tree): Copy
from trunk.
* gfortran.dg/pr44592.f90: New testcase.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr47286.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr44592.f90
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/gcc/tree-ssa-ccp.c
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/gcc/tree-ssa-structalias.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/44592] [4.5 Regression] wrong code at -O3
[not found] <bug-44592-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2011-01-17 11:39 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-01-17 11:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-17 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44592
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Known to work| |4.5.3, 4.6.0
Resolution| |FIXED
Known to fail| |4.5.2
--- Comment #17 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-17 11:34:31 UTC ---
Fixed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread