From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31528 invoked by alias); 2 Jul 2010 06:59:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 31481 invoked by uid 48); 2 Jul 2010 06:58:58 -0000 Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2010 06:59:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100702065858.31480.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c/44774] -Werror=edantic In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "manu at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-07/txt/msg00154.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #4 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-02 06:58 ------- I knew this couldn't be easy ;-) Let's restrict to -pedantic first. It is the only warning flag that doesn't start with "-W". This breaks some code that expects that every warning flag starts with -W. I want to introduce -Wpedantic as an alias. You do not like the name. What is your suggestion? Manuel. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44774