public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/42835]  New: Missed merging common code sequence at the end of two basic blocks
@ 2010-01-21 21:01 carrot at google dot com
  2010-01-21 21:54 ` [Bug target/42835] " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: carrot at google dot com @ 2010-01-21 21:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

Compile the following code with options -march=armv7-a -mthumb -Os

int foo(int *p, int i )
{
      return( (i < 0 && *p == 1)
           || (i > 0 && *p == 2) );
}

Gcc generates:

foo:
        cmp     r1, #0
        bge     .L2
        ldr     r0, [r0, #0]
        cmp     r0, #1
        ite     ne         //  A
        movne   r0, #0     //  B
        moveq   r0, #1     //  C
        b       .L3
.L2:
        it      eq
        moveq   r0, r1
        beq     .L3
        ldr     r0, [r0, #0]
        cmp     r0, #2
        ite     ne         // D
        movne   r0, #0     // E
        moveq   r0, #1     // F
.L3:
        bx      lr

Instructions ABC are same as DEF, ideally ABC can be removed and generates
following code:

foo:
        @ args = 0, pretend = 0, frame = 0
        @ frame_needed = 0, uses_anonymous_args = 0
        @ link register save eliminated.
        cmp     r1, #0
        bge     .L2
        ldr     r0, [r0, #0]
        cmp     r0, #1
        b       .L3
.L2:
        it      eq
        moveq   r0, r1
        beq     .L3
        ldr     r0, [r0, #0]
        cmp     r0, #2
.L3:
        ite     ne
        movne   r0, #0
        moveq   r0, #1
        bx      lr

This should be handled by try_crossjump_bb. But a single rtl insn is used to
represent the compare and following IT block, like following. So they looks
different.

(insn:TI 24 22 26 src/t1.c:3 (parallel [
            (set (reg:SI 0 r0 [orig:133 D.2006 ] [133])
                (eq:SI (reg:SI 0 r0 [145])
                    (const_int 2 [0x2])))
            (clobber (reg:CC 24 cc))
        ]) 682 {*thumb2_compare_scc} (expr_list:REG_UNUSED (reg:CC 24 cc)
        (nil)))

(insn:TI 13 11 70 src/t1.c:3 (parallel [
            (set (reg:SI 0 r0 [orig:133 D.2006 ] [133])
                (eq:SI (reg:SI 0 r0 [142])
                    (const_int 1 [0x1])))
            (clobber (reg:CC 24 cc))
        ]) 682 {*thumb2_compare_scc} (expr_list:REG_UNUSED (reg:CC 24 cc)
        (nil)))

Can we break this insn into two separate ones, one is compare insn to set the
cc register, the other is the IT block?


-- 
           Summary: Missed merging common code sequence at the end of two
                    basic blocks
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.5.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: target
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: carrot at google dot com
 GCC build triplet: i686-linux
  GCC host triplet: i686-linux
GCC target triplet: arm-eabi


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42835


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/42835] Missed merging common code sequence at the end of two basic blocks
  2010-01-21 21:01 [Bug target/42835] New: Missed merging common code sequence at the end of two basic blocks carrot at google dot com
@ 2010-01-21 21:54 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-01-22 11:23 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/42835] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-01-21 21:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 

steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|                            |16996
              nThis|                            |
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2010-01-21 21:53:50
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42835


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug rtl-optimization/42835] Missed merging common code sequence at the end of two basic blocks
  2010-01-21 21:01 [Bug target/42835] New: Missed merging common code sequence at the end of two basic blocks carrot at google dot com
  2010-01-21 21:54 ` [Bug target/42835] " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-01-22 11:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-02-08 12:14 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-01-22 11:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-01-22 11:23 -------
Probably a missed cross-jumping opportunity


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |enhancement
          Component|target                      |rtl-optimization
           Keywords|                            |missed-optimization


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42835


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug rtl-optimization/42835] Missed merging common code sequence at the end of two basic blocks
  2010-01-21 21:01 [Bug target/42835] New: Missed merging common code sequence at the end of two basic blocks carrot at google dot com
  2010-01-21 21:54 ` [Bug target/42835] " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-01-22 11:23 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/42835] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-02-08 12:14 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-02-08 16:51 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-07-02 16:23 ` bernds at gcc dot gnu dot org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-02-08 12:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-02-08 12:14 -------
Richard, can we split thumb2_compare_scc? If so, when/how would you do this?
(I'm thinking of a post-RA splitter, but perhaps it could be done earlier.)


-- 

steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42835


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug rtl-optimization/42835] Missed merging common code sequence at the end of two basic blocks
  2010-01-21 21:01 [Bug target/42835] New: Missed merging common code sequence at the end of two basic blocks carrot at google dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-02-08 12:14 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-02-08 16:51 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-07-02 16:23 ` bernds at gcc dot gnu dot org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-02-08 16:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-02-08 16:50 -------
Best to do it post RA, so that we can issue the best sequences of insns.  I
have some better sequences that could be generated for Thumb2 which would avoid
the need for an IT instruction in many cases.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42835


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug rtl-optimization/42835] Missed merging common code sequence at the end of two basic blocks
  2010-01-21 21:01 [Bug target/42835] New: Missed merging common code sequence at the end of two basic blocks carrot at google dot com
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-02-08 16:51 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-07-02 16:23 ` bernds at gcc dot gnu dot org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: bernds at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-07-02 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #4 from bernds at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-07-02 16:23 -------
Subject: Bug 42835

Author: bernds
Date: Fri Jul  2 16:22:33 2010
New Revision: 161725

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=161725
Log:
        PR target/42835
        * config/arm/arm-modes.def (CC_NOTB): New mode.
        * config/arm/arm.c (get_arm_condition_code): Handle it.
        * config/arm/thumb2.md (thumb2_compare_scc): Delete pattern.
        * config/arm/arm.md (subsi3_compare0_c): New pattern.
        (compare_scc): Now a define_and_split.  Add a number of extra
        splitters before it.

testsuite/
        PR target/42835
        * gcc.target/arm/pr42835.c: New test.


Added:
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr42835.c
Modified:
    trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/config/arm/arm-modes.def
    trunk/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
    trunk/gcc/config/arm/arm.md
    trunk/gcc/config/arm/thumb2.md
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42835


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug rtl-optimization/42835] Missed merging common code sequence at the end of two basic blocks
       [not found] <bug-42835-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2011-02-01  1:05 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-02-01  1:11 ` bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: bernds at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-01  1:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42835

Bernd Schmidt <bernds at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #6 from Bernd Schmidt <bernds at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-01 01:10:36 UTC ---
Fixed.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug rtl-optimization/42835] Missed merging common code sequence at the end of two basic blocks
       [not found] <bug-42835-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2011-02-01  1:05 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-02-01  1:11 ` bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: ramana at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-01  1:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42835

Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ramana at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-01 01:04:59 UTC ---
Bernd, can this now be marked as fixed for 4.6.0 ? 

Ramana    

Trunk today generates for the options provided the following sequence of code.

        cmp    r1, #0
    bge    .L2
    ldr    r0, [r0, #0]
    cmp    r0, #1
    b    .L5
.L2:
    beq    .L4
    ldr    r0, [r0, #0]
    cmp    r0, #2
.L5:
    ite    ne
    movne    r0, #0
    moveq    r0, #1
    bx    lr
.L4:
    mov    r0, r1
    bx    lr


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-02-01  1:11 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-01-21 21:01 [Bug target/42835] New: Missed merging common code sequence at the end of two basic blocks carrot at google dot com
2010-01-21 21:54 ` [Bug target/42835] " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-22 11:23 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/42835] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-08 12:14 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-08 16:51 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-02 16:23 ` bernds at gcc dot gnu dot org
     [not found] <bug-42835-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2011-02-01  1:05 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-01  1:11 ` bernds at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).