From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20853 invoked by alias); 5 Jul 2010 01:27:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 20813 invoked by uid 48); 5 Jul 2010 01:26:50 -0000 Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2010 01:27:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100705012650.20812.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c++/44781] unjustified warning about uinitialized variable In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-07/txt/msg00419.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-05 01:26 ------- Does not warn with: GNU C++ (GCC) version 4.6.0 20100627 (experimental) [trunk revision 161476] (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) compiled by GNU C version 4.6.0 20100627 (experimental) [trunk revision 161476], GMP version 4.3.2, MPFR version 2.4.2, MPC version 0.8.1 Though we could have the same issue: : # i_29 = PHI <1(3), 0(6)> # point$x$_18 = PHI : # i_1 = PHI # point$x$_17 = PHI Why aren't those two BB's combined? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44781