* [Bug target/44850] [4.6 Regression] Many test failures
2010-07-07 0:36 [Bug target/44850] New: [4.6 Regression] Many test failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2010-07-07 0:41 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-07-07 0:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2010-07-07 0:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-07-07 00:41 -------
There are so many failures that they won't show up at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-07/
nor
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2010-07/
since the messages are too big.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44850
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/44850] [4.6 Regression] Many test failures
2010-07-07 0:36 [Bug target/44850] New: [4.6 Regression] Many test failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-07-07 0:41 ` [Bug target/44850] " hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2010-07-07 0:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-07 0:44 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-07-07 0:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-07 00:42 -------
Actually it did:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2010-07/msg00102.html
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GCC target triplet| |i?86-*-* x86_64-*-*
Keywords| |wrong-code
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44850
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/44850] [4.6 Regression] Many test failures
2010-07-07 0:36 [Bug target/44850] New: [4.6 Regression] Many test failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-07-07 0:41 ` [Bug target/44850] " hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-07-07 0:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-07-07 0:44 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-07-07 0:50 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2010-07-07 0:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-07-07 00:44 -------
Mine didn't shown up. In any case, I have 18580+ execution test failures.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44850
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/44850] [4.6 Regression] Many test failures
2010-07-07 0:36 [Bug target/44850] New: [4.6 Regression] Many test failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-07 0:44 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2010-07-07 0:50 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-07-07 7:17 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2010-07-07 0:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-07-07 00:50 -------
I also have MANY execution test failures on Linux/x86-64.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44850
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/44850] [4.6 Regression] Many test failures
2010-07-07 0:36 [Bug target/44850] New: [4.6 Regression] Many test failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-07 0:50 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2010-07-07 7:17 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-07 13:37 ` hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-07 21:42 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-07-07 7:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-07 07:17 -------
Yeah, the amount of regressions is huge, both on x86_64-linux and i686-linux.
The difference is in i386 now overriding config/elfos.h definition:
/* Write the extra assembler code needed to declare a function properly.
Some svr4 assemblers need to also have something extra said about the
function's return value. We allow for that here. */
#ifndef ASM_DECLARE_FUNCTION_NAME
#define ASM_DECLARE_FUNCTION_NAME(FILE, NAME, DECL) \
do \
{ \
ASM_OUTPUT_TYPE_DIRECTIVE (FILE, NAME, "function"); \
ASM_DECLARE_RESULT (FILE, DECL_RESULT (DECL)); \
ASM_OUTPUT_LABEL (FILE, NAME); \
} \
while (0)
#endif
(and config/darwin.h, config/netbsd-aout.h and config/openbsd.h too).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44850
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/44850] [4.6 Regression] Many test failures
2010-07-07 0:36 [Bug target/44850] New: [4.6 Regression] Many test failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-07 7:17 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-07-07 13:37 ` hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-07 21:42 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-07-07 13:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-07 13:36 -------
Subject: Bug 44850
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Jul 7 13:36:31 2010
New Revision: 161911
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=161911
Log:
Revert revision 161876.
2010-07-07 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
PR target/44850
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_function_ms_hook_prologue): Revert
revision 161876.
(ix86_expand_prologue): Likewise.
(ix86_handle_fndecl_attribute): Likewise.
(ix86_asm_declare_function_name): Likewise.
* config/i386/i386.h (ASM_DECLARE_FUNCTION_NAME): Likewise.
* config/i386/cygming.h (ASM_DECLARE_FUNCTION_NAME): Likewise.
(SUBTARGET_ASM_DECLARE_FUNCTION_NAME): Likewise.
* config/i386/i386-protos.h (ix86_asm_declare_function_name):
Likewise.
* doc/extend.texi: Likewise.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/config/i386/cygming.h
trunk/gcc/config/i386/i386-protos.h
trunk/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
trunk/gcc/config/i386/i386.h
trunk/gcc/doc/extend.texi
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44850
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/44850] [4.6 Regression] Many test failures
2010-07-07 0:36 [Bug target/44850] New: [4.6 Regression] Many test failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-07 13:37 ` hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-07-07 21:42 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2010-07-07 21:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-07-07 21:41 -------
Fixed.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44850
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread