From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9856 invoked by alias); 7 Jul 2010 15:06:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 8314 invoked by uid 48); 7 Jul 2010 15:06:20 -0000 Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2010 15:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100707150620.8313.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug debug/44832] [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure for C++ i386.c In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-07/txt/msg00755.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #29 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-07 15:06 ------- (In reply to comment #26) > thus I think we have to look for an instability in the SCC walker. There's a qsort call. Is compare_ops guaranteed never to return 0 for items that are not identical? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44832