From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24129 invoked by alias); 9 Jul 2010 15:59:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 22530 invoked by uid 48); 9 Jul 2010 15:59:32 -0000 Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 15:59:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100709155932.22529.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/44885] [4.6 regression] miscompilation of gnat.dg/aliasing3.adb after mem-ref2 In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-07/txt/msg01024.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #5 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-09 15:59 ------- > Eric, you probably know best what should be checked, can you prepare a patch > (that hopefully passes testing ... huh)? Yes, will do, but not before addressing the issues caught by the new size check on VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR. We have dozens of regressions in our internal testsuite. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44885