From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 629 invoked by alias); 9 Jul 2010 16:01:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 28173 invoked by alias); 9 Jul 2010 16:01:18 -0000 Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 16:01:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100709160118.28159.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/44885] [4.6 regression] miscompilation of gnat.dg/aliasing3.adb after mem-ref2 In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "rguenther at suse dot de" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-07/txt/msg01025.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de 2010-07-09 16:01 ------- Subject: Re: [4.6 regression] miscompilation of gnat.dg/aliasing3.adb after mem-ref2 On Fri, 9 Jul 2010, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > ------- Comment #5 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-09 15:59 ------- > > Eric, you probably know best what should be checked, can you prepare a patch > > (that hopefully passes testing ... huh)? > > Yes, will do, but not before addressing the issues caught by the new size check > on VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR. We have dozens of regressions in our internal testsuite. Heh - and I specifically restricted it to registers to avoid that ... ;) Richard. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44885