public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "iains at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug objc/44488] objc test inconsistencies w/ / w/out --enable-build-with-cxx Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 10:38:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20100710103818.5458.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-44488-5394@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ------- Comment #7 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-10 10:38 ------- Created an attachment (id=21173) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21173&action=view) improve robustness of runtime option choices. This should resolve the case where -fnext-runtime would be considered valid (for compile tests) because the target (non-darwin) system happened to have objc headers in the same place as a standard darwin installation. Tested on i686-apple-darwin9 [build --enable-build-with-cxx] , cris-elf (sim) and mipsabi64-elf (sim) with no changes in fails or counts on make check-gcc-objc. let me know if it solve that aspect of the problem for you. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44488
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-10 10:38 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2010-06-10 1:00 [Bug testsuite/44488] New: " amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-10 1:04 ` [Bug objc/44488] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-10 1:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-10 5:41 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-10 9:19 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-10 9:29 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-09 23:41 ` iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-10 10:38 ` iains at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message] 2010-07-11 1:01 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-13 15:20 ` iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-13 15:32 ` iains at gcc dot gnu dot org [not found] <bug-44488-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2011-01-10 20:28 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-10 23:38 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-11 9:33 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-09-14 12:44 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20100710103818.5458.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).