From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7715 invoked by alias); 10 Jul 2010 21:29:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 7673 invoked by uid 48); 10 Jul 2010 21:29:24 -0000 Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 21:29:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100710212924.7672.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/44903] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr35258.c execution test In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-07/txt/msg01164.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-10 21:29 ------- I get for all memory accesses an alignment of 8 at expansion time which looks correct (on i?86). Please debug this a bit, set_mem_attributes_minus_bitpos looks conservative enough. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Component|tree-optimization |target Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44903