* [Bug libstdc++/44121] [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails.
2010-05-13 18:46 [Bug libstdc++/44121] New: [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-05-13 18:47 ` iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-13 19:10 ` [Bug middle-end/44121] " paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
` (20 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: iains at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-05-13 18:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-13 18:47 -------
also:
FAIL: 27_io/basic_stringbuf/in_avail/wchar_t/1.cc (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/GCC/gcc-live-trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/27_io/basic_stringbuf/in_avail/wchar_t/1.cc:53:1:
error: Inline clone with address taken
std::basic_string<_CharT, _Traits, _Alloc>::~basic_string() [with _CharT =
wchar_t, _Traits = std::char_traits<wchar_t>, _Alloc = std::allocator
<wchar_t>]/817(-1) @0x416fd774 (asm: _ZNSbIwSt11char_traitsIwESaIwEED1Ev)
(inline copy in virtual std::basic_stringbuf<wchar_t>::~basic_stringbu
f()/842) availability:local analyzed 14 time, 12 benefit (6 after inlining) 5
size, 3 benefit (14 after inlining) 1 bytes stack usage address_ta
ken body local finalized inlinable
called by: virtual std::basic_stringbuf<wchar_t>::~basic_stringbuf()/842
(1.00 per call) (inlined)
calls: void std::basic_string<_CharT, _Traits,
_Alloc>::_Rep::_M_dispose(const _Alloc&) [with _CharT = wchar_t, _Traits =
std::char_traits<wch
ar_t>, _Alloc = std::allocator<wchar_t>]/786 (inlined) (1.00 per call)
References:
Refering this function: fn:void
_Z41__static_initialization_and_destruction_0ii.clone.0()/854 (addr) fn:void
_Z41__static_initialization_and_
destruction_0ii.clone.0()/854 (addr) fn:void
_Z41__static_initialization_and_destruction_0ii.clone.0()/854 (addr)
/GCC/gcc-live-trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/27_io/basic_stringbuf/in_avail/wchar_t/1.cc:53:1:
internal compiler error: verify_cgraph_node failed
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
WARNING: 27_io/basic_stringbuf/in_avail/wchar_t/1.cc compilation failed to
produce executable
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/44121] [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails.
2010-05-13 18:46 [Bug libstdc++/44121] New: [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-13 18:47 ` [Bug libstdc++/44121] " iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-05-13 19:10 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2010-05-13 19:13 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
` (19 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com @ 2010-05-13 19:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-05-13 19:10 -------
Seems pretty obvious to me that this is *not* a libstdc++ issue. I'm
tentatively categorizing it as middle-end and adding Honza due to Comment #2.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Component|libstdc++ |middle-end
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/44121] [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails.
2010-05-13 18:46 [Bug libstdc++/44121] New: [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-13 18:47 ` [Bug libstdc++/44121] " iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-13 19:10 ` [Bug middle-end/44121] " paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2010-05-13 19:13 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2010-05-13 19:24 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (18 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com @ 2010-05-13 19:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-05-13 19:12 -------
HJ, can you pin point the regressing revision? Thanks.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |hjl dot tools at gmail dot
| |com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/44121] [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails.
2010-05-13 18:46 [Bug libstdc++/44121] New: [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-05-13 19:13 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2010-05-13 19:24 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-05-13 19:41 ` iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (17 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2010-05-13 19:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-05-13 19:23 -------
libstdc++ tests are clean on Linux/ia32 as of revision 159368:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-05/msg01212.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/44121] [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails.
2010-05-13 18:46 [Bug libstdc++/44121] New: [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2010-05-13 19:24 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2010-05-13 19:41 ` iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-13 20:07 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (16 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: iains at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-05-13 19:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-13 19:41 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> libstdc++ tests are clean on Linux/ia32 as of revision 159368:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-05/msg01212.html
fails also on powerpc-apple-darwin9
last pass from regress:
Date: 2010-05-12T18:51:16Z
Revision: 159338
--
iains at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GCC target triplet|i686-apple-darwin9 |*-apple-darwin9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/44121] [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails.
2010-05-13 18:46 [Bug libstdc++/44121] New: [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2010-05-13 19:41 ` iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-05-13 20:07 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-05-13 20:25 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
` (15 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2010-05-13 20:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-05-13 20:07 -------
What is the first revision failed on darwin?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/44121] [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails.
2010-05-13 18:46 [Bug libstdc++/44121] New: [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2010-05-13 20:07 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2010-05-13 20:25 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2010-05-13 20:32 ` iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com @ 2010-05-13 20:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-05-13 20:25 -------
Yes, we need the help of people running darwin, on x86_64-linux (-m64) too the
problem cannot be reproduced.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/44121] [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails.
2010-05-13 18:46 [Bug libstdc++/44121] New: [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2010-05-13 20:25 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2010-05-13 20:32 ` iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-13 20:57 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
` (13 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: iains at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-05-13 20:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-13 20:31 -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> Yes, we need the help of people running darwin, on x86_64-linux (-m64) too the
> problem cannot be reproduced.
I've just built a reghunt tree ;-)
starting a successive approx. @159348 ...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/44121] [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails.
2010-05-13 18:46 [Bug libstdc++/44121] New: [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2010-05-13 20:32 ` iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-05-13 20:57 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2010-05-13 21:59 ` iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com @ 2010-05-13 20:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-05-13 20:57 -------
Thanks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/44121] [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails.
2010-05-13 18:46 [Bug libstdc++/44121] New: [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2010-05-13 20:57 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2010-05-13 21:59 ` iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-13 22:53 ` iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: iains at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-05-13 21:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-13 21:59 -------
(In reply to comment #9)
> Thanks.
between 159348 and 159356
will try and refine - but those changes look kinda connected
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/44121] [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails.
2010-05-13 18:46 [Bug libstdc++/44121] New: [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2010-05-13 21:59 ` iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-05-13 22:53 ` iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-20 6:26 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: iains at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-05-13 22:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #11 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-13 22:52 -------
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > Thanks.
>
> between 159348 and 159356
> will try and refine - but those changes look kinda connected
looks like it is 159354.
159353 is OK and the logs for the other changes look unrelated.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/44121] [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails.
2010-05-13 18:46 [Bug libstdc++/44121] New: [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2010-05-13 22:53 ` iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-05-20 6:26 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-24 21:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-05-20 6:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #12 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-20 06:25 -------
The failure in comment #1 might be related to PR 44206.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/44121] [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails.
2010-05-13 18:46 [Bug libstdc++/44121] New: [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2010-05-20 6:26 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-06-24 21:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-11 0:25 ` iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-24 21:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/44121] [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails.
2010-05-13 18:46 [Bug libstdc++/44121] New: [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2010-06-24 21:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-07-11 0:25 ` iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-11 4:58 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
` (7 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: iains at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-07-11 0:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #13 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-11 00:25 -------
this is still present, AFAICT, for *-*-darwin* at r162047.
Honza, since it was your patch that triggered this, any ideas on what we could
do to debug/solve this one?
in particular this; "error: Inline clone with address taken " is still
happening.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/44121] [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails.
2010-05-13 18:46 [Bug libstdc++/44121] New: [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-11 0:25 ` iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-07-11 4:58 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-07-23 11:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr @ 2010-07-11 4:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #14 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-07-11 04:58 -------
*** Bug 44590 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dominiq at lps dot ens dot
| |fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/44121] [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails.
2010-05-13 18:46 [Bug libstdc++/44121] New: [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-11 4:58 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
@ 2010-07-23 11:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-23 13:15 ` iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-07-23 11:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-23 11:53 -------
This seems fixed?
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/44121] [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails.
2010-05-13 18:46 [Bug libstdc++/44121] New: [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-23 11:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-07-23 13:15 ` iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-29 11:15 ` howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
` (4 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: iains at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-07-23 13:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #16 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-23 13:15 -------
(In reply to comment #15)
> This seems fixed?
well certainly not for 32 bit versions:
as of r162456 (i686) just tested locally and...
... ppc (162433) http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-07/msg02130.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/44121] [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails.
2010-05-13 18:46 [Bug libstdc++/44121] New: [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-23 13:15 ` iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-07-29 11:15 ` howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
2010-07-29 11:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu @ 2010-07-29 11:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #17 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2010-07-29 11:15 -------
On x86_64-apple-darwin10, these failures at -m32 and -m64 appear to be
suppressed when building with --enable-checking=release and reappear when
building with --enable-checking=yes.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-07/msg02700.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/44121] [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails.
2010-05-13 18:46 [Bug libstdc++/44121] New: [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-29 11:15 ` howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
@ 2010-07-29 11:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-06 11:08 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
` (2 subsequent siblings)
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-07-29 11:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-07-29 11:28:28
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/44121] [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails.
2010-05-13 18:46 [Bug libstdc++/44121] New: [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-29 11:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-08-06 11:08 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-08-06 12:48 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-08-11 10:22 ` iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr @ 2010-08-06 11:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #18 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-08-06 11:08 -------
AFAICT this pr seems to have been fixed between revisions 162881 (fail) and
162920 (OK) at least on x86_64-apple-darwin10.4.0 (-m32 and -m64) and
powerpc-apple-darwin9 (-m32, see
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-08/msg00530.html ).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/44121] [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails.
2010-05-13 18:46 [Bug libstdc++/44121] New: [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (19 preceding siblings ...)
2010-08-06 11:08 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
@ 2010-08-06 12:48 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-08-11 10:22 ` iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr @ 2010-08-06 12:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #19 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-08-06 12:48 -------
>From IRC:
<martinj> dominiq: r162911 and r162912 ...and no other recent change seems
relevant
<martinj> dominiq: whether the bug is fixed or just hidden, I can't really
tell at the moment
--
dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mjambor at suse dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/44121] [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails.
2010-05-13 18:46 [Bug libstdc++/44121] New: [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (20 preceding siblings ...)
2010-08-06 12:48 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
@ 2010-08-11 10:22 ` iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
21 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: iains at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-08-11 10:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #20 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-11 10:21 -------
also on i686-darwin9, closing as fixed.
--
iains at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread