From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10741 invoked by alias); 12 Jul 2010 23:33:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 10677 invoked by uid 48); 12 Jul 2010 23:33:19 -0000 Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 23:33:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100712233319.10676.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug bootstrap/44921] [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "hjl dot tools at gmail dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-07/txt/msg01329.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-07-12 23:33 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > The variable can not actually be used uninitalized, since min_cost is > initalized to INT_MAX, and the return type of rtx_cost is int. > So it is enough to shut up the compiler warning, no need to add an > extra test there. I.e. the first hunk should be sufficient. > Does the first chunk count as obvious? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44921