public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/25829]  New: [F2003] Asynchronous IO support
@ 2006-01-17 21:53 jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-01-17 23:33 ` [Bug fortran/25829] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (17 more replies)
  0 siblings, 18 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: jb at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-01-17 21:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

F2003 supports the ASYNCHRONOUS='YES' specifier in some IO statements, as well
as the WAIT io-unit statement.


-- 
           Summary: [F2003] Asynchronous IO support
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.2.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P3
         Component: fortran
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
OtherBugsDependingO 20585,25561
             nThis:


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/25829] [F2003] Asynchronous IO support
  2006-01-17 21:53 [Bug fortran/25829] New: [F2003] Asynchronous IO support jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-01-17 23:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-02-17  1:20 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (16 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-01-17 23:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-01-17 23:33 -------
Confirmed.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2006-01-17 23:33:35
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/25829] [F2003] Asynchronous IO support
  2006-01-17 21:53 [Bug fortran/25829] New: [F2003] Asynchronous IO support jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-01-17 23:33 ` [Bug fortran/25829] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-02-17  1:20 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-02-17  5:02 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (15 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-02-17  1:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-02-17 01:19 -------
I will be working pn this and have a strat in my local experimental branch


-- 

jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |dot org                     |org
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|2006-01-17 23:33:35         |2008-02-17 01:19:36
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/25829] [F2003] Asynchronous IO support
  2006-01-17 21:53 [Bug fortran/25829] New: [F2003] Asynchronous IO support jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-01-17 23:33 ` [Bug fortran/25829] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-02-17  1:20 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-02-17  5:02 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-02-23 16:49 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (14 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-02-17  5:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-02-17 05:02 -------
Keep this PR in mind while doing this. PR34705


-- 

jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |34705


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/25829] [F2003] Asynchronous IO support
  2006-01-17 21:53 [Bug fortran/25829] New: [F2003] Asynchronous IO support jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-02-17  5:02 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-02-23 16:49 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-04-05 22:19 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (13 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-02-23 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-02-23 16:48 -------
Status: local experimental trunk

Front-end has most if not all keywords compiling.

DECIMAL= is working all the way through to runtime.

WAIT compiles and executes a stub in the runtime with a new st_parameter_wait
structure to pass parameters from the front end to the library.  The stub is
_gfortran_st_wait.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/25829] [F2003] Asynchronous IO support
  2006-01-17 21:53 [Bug fortran/25829] New: [F2003] Asynchronous IO support jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-02-23 16:49 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-04-05 22:19 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-04-05 22:24 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (12 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-04-05 22:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-04-05 22:18 -------
Subject: Bug 25829

Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Apr  5 22:18:03 2008
New Revision: 133943

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=133943
Log:
2008-04-05  Jerry DeLisle  <jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org>

        PR fortran/25829 28655
        * gfortran.map: Add new symbol, _gfortran_st_wait.
        * libgfortran.h (st_paramter_common): Add new I/O parameters.
        * open.c (st_option decimal_opt[], st_option encoding_opt[],
        st_option round_opt[], st_option sign_opt[], st_option async_opt[]):
New
        parameter option arrays. (edit_modes): Add checks for new parameters.
        (new_unit): Likewise. (st_open): Likewise.
        * list_read.c (CASE_SEPERATORS): Add ';' as a valid separator.
        (eat_separator): Handle deimal comma. (read_logical): Fix whitespace.
        (parse_real): Handle decimal comma. (read_real): Handle decimal comma.
        * read.c (read_a): Use decimal status flag to allow comma in place of a
        decimal point. (read_f): Allow comma as acceptable character in float.
        According to decimal flag, substitute a period for a comma.
        (read_x): If decimal status flag is comma, disable the read_comma flag,
        not allowing comma as a delimiter, an extension otherwise.
        * io.h: (unit_decimal, unit_encoding, unit_round, unit_sign,
        unit_async): New enumerators. Add all new I/O parameters.
        * unix.c (unix_stream, int_stream): Add io_mode asychronous I/O
control.
        (move_pos_offset, fd_alloc_w_at): Fix some whitespace.
        (fd_sfree): Use new enumerator. (fd_read): Likewise.
        (fd_write): Likewise. (fd_close): Fix whitespace.
        (fd_open): Use new enumertors. (tempfile, regular_file,
        open_external): Fix whitespace. (output_stream, error_stream): Set
        method. (stream_offset): Fix whitespace.
        * transfer.c: (st_option decimal_opt[], sign_opt[], blank_opt[]): New
        option arrays.  (formatted_transfer_scalar): Set sf_read_comma flag
        based on new decimal_status flag. (data_transfer_init): Initialize new
        parameters. Add checks for decimal, sign, and blank. (st_wait): New
stub.
        * format.c: (format_lex): Add format specifiers DP, DC, and D.
        (parse_format_list): Parse the new specifiers.
        * write.c (write_decimal): Use new sign enumerators to set the sign.
        (write_complex): Handle decimal comma and semi-colon separator.
        (nml_write_obj): Likewise.
        * write_float.def: Revise sign enumerators. (calculate_sign): Use new
        sign enumerators. (output_float): Likewise. Use new decimal_status flag
        to set the decimal character to a point or a comma.

Modified:
    trunk/libgfortran/ChangeLog
    trunk/libgfortran/gfortran.map
    trunk/libgfortran/io/format.c
    trunk/libgfortran/io/io.h
    trunk/libgfortran/io/list_read.c
    trunk/libgfortran/io/open.c
    trunk/libgfortran/io/read.c
    trunk/libgfortran/io/transfer.c
    trunk/libgfortran/io/unit.c
    trunk/libgfortran/io/unix.c
    trunk/libgfortran/io/write.c
    trunk/libgfortran/io/write_float.def
    trunk/libgfortran/libgfortran.h


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/25829] [F2003] Asynchronous IO support
  2006-01-17 21:53 [Bug fortran/25829] New: [F2003] Asynchronous IO support jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-04-05 22:19 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-04-05 22:24 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-04-05 22:35 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (11 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-04-05 22:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-04-05 22:24 -------
Subject: Bug 25829

Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Apr  5 22:23:27 2008
New Revision: 133944

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=133944
Log:
2008-04-05  Jerry DeLisle  <jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org>
            Francois-Xavier Coudert  <fxcoudert@gcc.gnu.org>

        PR fortran/25829 28655
        * dump-parse-tree.c (gfc_show_code_node): Show new I/O parameters.
        * gfortran.h (gfc_statement): Add ST_WAIT enumerator.
        (gfc_open): Add pointers for decimal, encoding, round, sign,
        asynchronous. (gfc_inquire): Add pointers for asynchronous, decimal,
        encoding, pending, round, sign, size, id.
        (gfc_wait): New typedef struct. (gfc_dt): Add pointers for id, pos,
        asynchronous, blank, decimal, delim, pad, round, sign.
        (gfc_exec_op): Add EXEC_WAIT enumerator. (gfc_code): Add pointer for
        wait. (gfc_free_wait), (gfc_resolve_wait): New function prototypes.
        * trans-stmt.h (gfc_trans_wait): New function prototype.
        * trans.c (gfc_trans_code): Add case for EXEC_WAIT.
        * io.c (io_tag): Add new tags for DECIMAL, ENCODING, ROUND, SIGN,
        ASYCHRONOUS, ID. (match_open_element): Add matchers for new tags.
        (gfc_free_open): Free new pointers. (gfc_resolve_open): Resolve new
        tags. (gfc_resolve_open): Remove comment around check for allowed
        values and ASYNCHRONOUS, update it.  Likewise for DECIMAL, ENCODING,
        ROUND, and SIGN. (match_dt_element): Add matching for new tags.
        (gfc_free_wait): New function. (gfc_resolve_wait): New function.
        (match_wait_element): New function. (gfc_match_wait): New function.
        * resolve.c (gfc_resolve_blocks): Add case for EXEC_WAIT.
        (resolve_code): Add case for EXEC_WAIT. 
        * st.c (gfc_free_statement): Add case for EXEC_WAIT.
        * trans-io.c (ioparam_type): Add IOPARM_ptype_wait. (gfc_st_parameter):
        Add "wait" entry. (iocall): Add IOCALL_WAIT enumerator.
        (gfc_build_io_library_fndecls): Add function declaration for st_wait.
        (gfc_trans_open): Add mask bits for new I/O tags.
        (gfc_trans_inquire): Add mask bits for new I/O tags.
        (gfc_trans_wait): New translation function.
        (build_dt): Add mask bits for new I/O tags.
        * match.c (gfc_match_if) Add matcher for "wait".
        * match.h (gfc_match_wait): Prototype for new function.
        * ioparm.def: Add new I/O parameter definitions.
        * parse.c (decode_statement): Add match for "wait" statement.
        (next_statement): Add case for ST_WAIT. (gfc_ascii_statement): Same.

Modified:
    trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/fortran/dump-parse-tree.c
    trunk/gcc/fortran/gfortran.h
    trunk/gcc/fortran/io.c
    trunk/gcc/fortran/ioparm.def
    trunk/gcc/fortran/match.c
    trunk/gcc/fortran/match.h
    trunk/gcc/fortran/parse.c
    trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
    trunk/gcc/fortran/st.c
    trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-io.c
    trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.h
    trunk/gcc/fortran/trans.c


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/25829] [F2003] Asynchronous IO support
  2006-01-17 21:53 [Bug fortran/25829] New: [F2003] Asynchronous IO support jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-04-05 22:24 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-04-05 22:35 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-04-07 22:07 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-04-05 22:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-04-05 22:34 -------
Subject: Bug 25829

Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Apr  5 22:33:14 2008
New Revision: 133945

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=133945
Log:
2008-04-05  Jerry DeLisle  <jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org>

        PR fortran/25829 28655
        * gfortran.dg/f2003_io_1.f03: New test.
        * gfortran.dg/f2003_io_2.f03: New test.
        * gfortran.dg/f2003_io_3.f03: New test.
        * gfortran.dg/f2003_io_4.f03: New test.
        * gfortran.dg/f2003_io_5.f03: New test.
        * gfortran.dg/f2003_io_6.f03: New test.
        * gfortran.dg/f2003_io_7.f03: New test.

Added:
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/f2003_io_1.f03
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/f2003_io_2.f03
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/f2003_io_3.f03
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/f2003_io_4.f03
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/f2003_io_5.f03
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/f2003_io_6.f03
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/f2003_io_7.f03
Modified:
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/25829] [F2003] Asynchronous IO support
  2006-01-17 21:53 [Bug fortran/25829] New: [F2003] Asynchronous IO support jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-04-05 22:35 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-04-07 22:07 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-04-07 22:09 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-04-07 22:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-04-07 22:06 -------
Subject: Bug 25829

Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Apr  7 22:05:52 2008
New Revision: 133988

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=133988
Log:
2008-04-07  Jerry DeLisle  <jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org>

        PR fortran/25829 28655
        * io/open.c (edit_modes): Set flags.async. (new_unit) Set flags.async
        and flags.status. (st_open): Initialize flags.async.
        * io/list_read.c (read_charactor): Use delim_status instead of
        flags.delim.
        * io/read.c (read_x): Use pad_status instead of flags.pad.
        * io/inquire.c (inquire_via_unit): Add new checks.
        (inquire_via_filename): Likewise.
        * io/io.h (st_parameter_inquire): Add new flags.
        (st_parameter_dt): Likewise.
        * io/unit.c (get_internal_unit): Set flags.async. (init_units): Set
        flags.async.
        * io/transfer.c: Add delim and pad option arrays. (read_sf): Use
        pad_status instead of flags.pad. (read_block): Likewise.
        (data_transfer_init): Set flags.async and add checks.
        * io/write.c (write_character): Use delim_status.
        (list_formatted_write_scalar): Likewise. (nml_write_obj): Likewise.
        (namelist_write): Likewise.

Modified:
    trunk/libgfortran/ChangeLog
    trunk/libgfortran/io/inquire.c
    trunk/libgfortran/io/io.h
    trunk/libgfortran/io/list_read.c
    trunk/libgfortran/io/open.c
    trunk/libgfortran/io/read.c
    trunk/libgfortran/io/transfer.c
    trunk/libgfortran/io/unit.c
    trunk/libgfortran/io/write.c


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/25829] [F2003] Asynchronous IO support
  2006-01-17 21:53 [Bug fortran/25829] New: [F2003] Asynchronous IO support jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-04-07 22:07 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-04-07 22:09 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-04-07 22:12 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-04-07 22:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-04-07 22:08 -------
Subject: Bug 25829

Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Apr  7 22:07:44 2008
New Revision: 133989

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=133989
Log:
2008-04-07  Jerry DeLisle  <jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org>

        PR fortran/25829 28655
        * io.c (io_tag): Add new tags for decimal, encoding, asynchronous,
        round, sign, and id. (match_open_element): Match new tags.
        (gfc_resolve_open): Resolve new tags. (gfc_match_open): Enable encoding
        for DEFAULT only. Update error messages. (match_dt_element): Fix match
        tag for asynchronous. Update error messages. (gfc_free_inquire): Free
        new expressions. (match_inquire_element): Match new tags.
        (gfc_match_inquire): Add constraint for ID and PENDING.
        (gfc_resolve_inquire): Resolve new tags.
        * trans-io.c (gfc_trans_inquire): Clean up whitespace and fix setting
of
        mask for ID parameter.
        * ioparm.def: Fix order of parameters for pending, round, and sign.
        NOTE: These must line up with the definitions in libgfortran/io/io.h.
or
        things don't work.

Modified:
    trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/fortran/io.c
    trunk/gcc/fortran/ioparm.def
    trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-io.c


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/25829] [F2003] Asynchronous IO support
  2006-01-17 21:53 [Bug fortran/25829] New: [F2003] Asynchronous IO support jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-04-07 22:09 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-04-07 22:12 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-04-10 21:23 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-04-07 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-04-07 22:11 -------
Subject: Bug 25829

Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Apr  7 22:10:41 2008
New Revision: 133991

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=133991
Log:
2008-04-07  Jerry DeLisle  <jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org>

        PR fortran/25829 28655
        * gfortran.dg/write_check2.f90: Update dg-error.
        * gfortran.dg/io_constraints_1.f90: Udate dg-error.

Modified:
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/io_constraints_1.f90
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/write_check2.f90


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/25829] [F2003] Asynchronous IO support
  2006-01-17 21:53 [Bug fortran/25829] New: [F2003] Asynchronous IO support jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-04-07 22:12 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-04-10 21:23 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-04-11 15:26 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-10 21:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #11 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-04-10 21:23 -------
Jerry, is this complete? If not, could you please summarize what's left?
Thanks.


-- 

dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/25829] [F2003] Asynchronous IO support
  2006-01-17 21:53 [Bug fortran/25829] New: [F2003] Asynchronous IO support jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-04-10 21:23 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-04-11 15:26 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-10-28 22:03 ` jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-11 15:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-04-11 15:26 -------
gfortran currently accepts asynchronous I/O syntax. The F2003 standard permits
the implementation to actually do synchronous I/O.  gfortran run time library
does not actually perform I/O asynchronously, but does so synchronously.

To implement this we need to develop the underlying scheme with the unit and
DTP structures, develop config magic to identify targets that actually have
support for asynchronous I/O, write the code that keeps track of the I/O calls,
there status and completion, and address the threading concerns.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/25829] [F2003] Asynchronous IO support
  2006-01-17 21:53 [Bug fortran/25829] New: [F2003] Asynchronous IO support jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (11 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-04-11 15:26 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-10-28 22:03 ` jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-12-11 22:28 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: jb at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-10-28 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #13 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-10-28 22:03 -------
Reassigning to myself, I have a plan how to proceed with supporting proper
async I/O in the library.


-- 

jb at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot|jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   |org                         |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/25829] [F2003] Asynchronous IO support
  2006-01-17 21:53 [Bug fortran/25829] New: [F2003] Asynchronous IO support jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (12 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-10-28 22:03 ` jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-12-11 22:28 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-12-11 22:29 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-12-11 22:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #14 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-12-11 22:28 -------
Test case:
  http://users.erols.com/dnagle/pub/async_io.f03

Works with ifort, fails with gfortran. I think it needs real asynchronous I/O
to work. Additionally, gfortran does not yet support the ASYNCHRONOUS
attribute.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/25829] [F2003] Asynchronous IO support
  2006-01-17 21:53 [Bug fortran/25829] New: [F2003] Asynchronous IO support jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (13 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-12-11 22:28 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-12-11 22:29 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-01-08 10:11 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-12-11 22:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #15 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-12-11 22:28 -------
(In reply to comment #14)
> Test case:
>   http://users.erols.com/dnagle/pub/async_io.f03
which additionally needs the file/module:
  http://users.erols.com/dnagle/pub/f03def.f90


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/25829] [F2003] Asynchronous IO support
  2006-01-17 21:53 [Bug fortran/25829] New: [F2003] Asynchronous IO support jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (14 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-12-11 22:29 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-01-08 10:11 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-01-08 10:42 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-07-13 17:34 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-01-08 10:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #16 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-01-08 10:11 -------
For completeness: I just committed support for the ASYNCHRONOUS attribute:
  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-01/msg00049.html
  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-01/msg00192.html
which is treated as no op.

One needs to think carefully whether one needs to take care of ASYNCHRONOUS for
the middle end when real async I/O is implemented. For a simple:
  write(9, ..., asynchronous='yes') foo
  ...
  write(9, ...) ! force WAIT on unit 9
  foo = 8
presumably not using "&foo" in the first write call lets the address escape
thus unless a function is known (to the ME) to not touch "foo" (indirectly), no
problem should occur. But how about:

  ! Note: using "foo" in AIO implies the ASYNCHRONOUS attribute for foo
  write(9, ..., asynchronous='yes', id=waitid) foo
  call finish(foo, waitid)
contains
  subroutine finish(var, wait)
    asynchronous :: var
    wait(wait)
    var = 7
  end subroutine finish

Here, the ME might be tempted to change the order of WAIT and "var = 7"; thus
in this case we probably need to tell the ME about the ASYNCHRONOUS attribute.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/25829] [F2003] Asynchronous IO support
  2006-01-17 21:53 [Bug fortran/25829] New: [F2003] Asynchronous IO support jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (15 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-01-08 10:11 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-01-08 10:42 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-07-13 17:34 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-01-08 10:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #17 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-01-08 10:42 -------
(In reply to comment #16)
> Here, the ME might be tempted to change the order of WAIT and "var = 7"; thus
> in this case we probably need to tell the ME about the ASYNCHRONOUS attribute.

Probably by dropping the "restricted" for the pointer argument (as one would to
for TARGET). One should also check that it works for:
  subroutine finish(var, wait)
    BLOCK
      asynchronous :: var
      wait(wait)
      var = 7
    end BLOCK
  end subroutine finish
assuming that "asynchronous" applies in the block to the dummy argument.
(Should work analogously for volatile.)


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/25829] [F2003] Asynchronous IO support
  2006-01-17 21:53 [Bug fortran/25829] New: [F2003] Asynchronous IO support jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (16 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-01-08 10:42 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-07-13 17:34 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
  17 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-07-13 17:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #18 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-07-13 17:34 -------
Reminder: The function decl ("fn spec") needs to be updated for asynchronous
I/O; in particular WAIT needs to have the "X" (unused argument) removed.
Possibly, other function names should be used to keep the nonclobber of the
current transfer functions. Cf. also PR 43665.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/25829] [F2003] Asynchronous IO support
       [not found] <bug-25829-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-07-13  9:25 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-07-13 13:16 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-07-13 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829

--- Comment #23 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-07-13 13:15:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> I think the easiest is to not set the "restrict" of dummy arguments involved in
> ASYNCHRONOUS I/O.

It seems that GCC understands something different than I by "restrict"; it
seems to be much less aggressive than I thought - and seems to match exactly
what we need, such that no action seems to be required.

Cf. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-07/msg00208.html and see PR 49733 for a
missed-optimization PR, which is for adding an variable attribute which does
optimize across function calls - which is allowed most of the time in Fortran
(except for ASYNCHRONOUS and for coarrays).


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/25829] [F2003] Asynchronous IO support
       [not found] <bug-25829-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-04-15  9:11 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-07-13  9:25 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-07-13 13:16 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-07-13  9:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829

--- Comment #22 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-07-13 09:24:40 UTC ---
Note: TR 29113 introduces a wider coverage of ASYNCHRONOUS, cf. almost-PDTR
29113 at ftp://ftp.nag.co.uk/sc22wg5/N1851-N1900/N1866.pdf.

I think the easiest is to not set the "restrict" of dummy arguments involved in
ASYNCHRONOUS I/O. That way, one has:

  call user_write(id, var)
  ...
  call user_wait(id)
  var = ...

The address of the "var" escapes at "user_write" and is thus available to
"user_wait" - hence, "var =" will not be moved across "user_wait". Ditto for
gfortran's asynchronous I/O.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/25829] [F2003] Asynchronous IO support
       [not found] <bug-25829-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2011-03-04 18:08 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-03-04 18:12 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-04-15  9:11 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-07-13  9:25 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-07-13 13:16 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-04-15  9:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829

--- Comment #21 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-04-15 09:10:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> A brute-force method would be to add a __sync_synchronize

Actually, this idea does not work properly - neither for INQUIRE(...,PENDING=)
nor for ASYNCHRONOUS with MPI 3. (Cf. link below)

(In reply to comment #20)
> If ASYNCHRONOUS expands to volatile, no barrier should be necessary.

Well, VOLATILE has the wrong semantics, i.e. it will only partially solve the
problem. Additionally, you create huge missed-optimization issues.

I have now asked at GCC@ (and fortran@) for some suggestions:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-04/msg00143.html

(There is currently also a vivid discussion on J3's interop and MPI Forum's
MPI3-Fortran mailing lists about ASYNCHRONOUS and nonblocking MPI calls.)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/25829] [F2003] Asynchronous IO support
       [not found] <bug-25829-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2011-03-04 18:08 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-04 18:12 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-04-15  9:11 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-04 18:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-04 18:11:56 UTC ---
If ASYNCHRONOUS expands to volatile, no barrier should be necessary.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/25829] [F2003] Asynchronous IO support
       [not found] <bug-25829-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2011-03-04 18:08 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-03-04 18:12 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-04 18:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829

Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #19 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-04 18:08:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
>   subroutine finish(var, wait)
>     asynchronous :: var
>     wait(wait)
>     var = 7
>   end subroutine finish
> 
> Here, the ME might be tempted to change the order of WAIT and "var = 7"; thus
> in this case we probably need to tell the ME about the ASYNCHRONOUS attribute.

A brute-force method would be to add a __sync_synchronize
(BUILT_IN_SYNCHRONIZE) call after the WAIT. But maybe one finds a better way
which restricts the barrier to only "var" (and other asynchronous variables)
without influencing unrelated variables.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-07-13 13:16 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-01-17 21:53 [Bug fortran/25829] New: [F2003] Asynchronous IO support jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-17 23:33 ` [Bug fortran/25829] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-17  1:20 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-17  5:02 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-23 16:49 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-04-05 22:19 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-04-05 22:24 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-04-05 22:35 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-04-07 22:07 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-04-07 22:09 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-04-07 22:12 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-10 21:23 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-11 15:26 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-10-28 22:03 ` jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-12-11 22:28 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-12-11 22:29 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-08 10:11 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-08 10:42 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-13 17:34 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
     [not found] <bug-25829-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2011-03-04 18:08 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-04 18:12 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-15  9:11 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-13  9:25 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-13 13:16 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).