From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11652 invoked by alias); 14 Jul 2010 14:15:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 11416 invoked by uid 48); 14 Jul 2010 14:14:58 -0000 Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 14:15:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100714141458.11414.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c++/44909] [C++0x] Copy constructors implicitly deleted In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "marc dot glisse at normalesup dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-07/txt/msg01485.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #4 from marc dot glisse at normalesup dot org 2010-07-14 14:14 ------- The patch (or another one committed recently) seems to have broken the attached testcase (as you can see from the names, this comes from the same code), including in C++98 mode. If it is unrelated, sorry for adding it to this bug instead of creating a new one. (I am not reopening the bug, you probably know better than me what the appropriate action is) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44909