From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3995 invoked by alias); 15 Jul 2010 16:02:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 2261 invoked by uid 48); 15 Jul 2010 16:02:03 -0000 Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 16:02:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100715160203.2260.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/44948] -mavx changes ABI In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-07/txt/msg01596.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-15 16:02 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Caller and call expander try to honor type alignment. > See PR 35771 and PR 35767. I think we should replace > BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT with MAX_STACK_ALIGNMENT. The call expander should not look at arguments but only at the function prototype argument specifications. See my comments on the patches for the above PRs why they are wrong. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44948