public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/44995] New: define a macro for presence of -mregnames option
@ 2010-07-19 21:45 fche at redhat dot com
2010-07-19 21:48 ` [Bug target/44995] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-19 21:51 ` fche at redhat dot com
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2010-07-19 21:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
In some cases, it would be useful if the presence of the gcc -mregnames
option was not only communicated to the assembler, but also to the C
program being compiled. This comes up in an unusual usage of
inline-assembler operands, where the ambiguity between literals and
register names is a problem. (http://sourceware.org/PR11821).
With such a macro (say, -D__GCC_REGNAMES), the inline-asm code could
emit extra code strings to allow resolution of the ambiguities.
--
Summary: define a macro for presence of -mregnames option
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: fche at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44995
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/44995] define a macro for presence of -mregnames option
2010-07-19 21:45 [Bug target/44995] New: define a macro for presence of -mregnames option fche at redhat dot com
@ 2010-07-19 21:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-19 21:51 ` fche at redhat dot com
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-07-19 21:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-19 21:48 -------
>ambiguity
It is not ambiguous at all in correct usage of inline-asm. I don't support a
macro for this option at all.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GCC target triplet| |powerpc*-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44995
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/44995] define a macro for presence of -mregnames option
2010-07-19 21:45 [Bug target/44995] New: define a macro for presence of -mregnames option fche at redhat dot com
2010-07-19 21:48 ` [Bug target/44995] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-07-19 21:51 ` fche at redhat dot com
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2010-07-19 21:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from fche at redhat dot com 2010-07-19 21:51 -------
> It is not ambiguous at all in correct usage of inline-asm.
Well, considering that the "g" constraint can generate either a literal or
a naked register number, the ambiguity is real even for normal inline assembly.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44995
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/44995] define a macro for presence of -mregnames option
[not found] <bug-44995-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2011-08-19 8:14 ` jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com
@ 2011-08-19 11:37 ` fche at redhat dot com
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: fche at redhat dot com @ 2011-08-19 11:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44995
--- Comment #4 from Frank Ch. Eigler <fche at redhat dot com> 2011-08-19 11:24:19 UTC ---
We have worked around this powerpc oddity in systemtap's recent sdt.h
versions by using both %0 and %I0 together to get a special markup for
literals vs. register names.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/44995] define a macro for presence of -mregnames option
[not found] <bug-44995-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2011-08-19 8:14 ` jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com
2011-08-19 11:37 ` fche at redhat dot com
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com @ 2011-08-19 8:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44995
Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jan.kratochvil at redhat
| |dot com
--- Comment #3 from Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com> 2011-08-19 08:05:07 UTC ---
This seems to be now related to PR 32998 -grecord-gcc-switches although that
works only with DWARF, -frecord-gcc-switches cannot differentiate between CUs.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-08-19 11:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-07-19 21:45 [Bug target/44995] New: define a macro for presence of -mregnames option fche at redhat dot com
2010-07-19 21:48 ` [Bug target/44995] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-19 21:51 ` fche at redhat dot com
[not found] <bug-44995-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2011-08-19 8:14 ` jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com
2011-08-19 11:37 ` fche at redhat dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).