From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2085 invoked by alias); 20 Jul 2010 19:21:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 1858 invoked by alias); 20 Jul 2010 19:20:47 -0000 Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 19:21:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100720192047.1857.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug bootstrap/39150] Configure scripts have no 64-Bit Solaris defined (only i386-solaris*). In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-07/txt/msg02114.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #17 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE 2010-07-20 19:20 ------- Subject: Re: Configure scripts have no 64-Bit Solaris defined (only i386-solaris*). > ------- Comment #16 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2010-07-20 19:02 ------- > (In reply to comment #15) >> (In reply to comment #13) >> OpenSolaris recently added support for the ARM Processor, so that adds a few >> more 'multi-lib modes' that need to be supported, along with the expanded line True, but irrelevant: each port only supports the multilibs it needs, and not several different configurations with each from the set of multilibs becoming the default. >> of SPARC Processors now being supported. The OpenSolaris Group also has a 'call >> for Ports', so in theory our mechanism _must_ be general enough to support any >> possible Processor ... The mechanism is, of course. > Additional note for this RFE (which _might_ get re-opened, someday): > > OpenSolaris now runs on mips-sun-solaris2.11 > http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Project+mips/Tools Far from it: there are minimal binutils and gcc patches yet, nothing more. Rainer -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39150