public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rodolfo at rodsoft dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/45012] Invalid ambiguity on partial class specialization matching
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 03:03:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100721030317.18074.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-45012-6196@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>



------- Comment #3 from rodolfo at rodsoft dot org  2010-07-21 03:03 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> This enum value has an anonymous type which is not valid in the  
> context of templates in C++03/98. It is valid in the current draft of C 
> ++0x though. But I cannot remember if 4.5 implements that rule for - 
> std=gnu++0x (-std=c++0x).

But I'm not using that anonymous type for template argument deduction (i.e.:
foo<bar<RUNTIME>,bar<RUNTIME>>), I'm just using in a comparison with an int.
But even if I turn it into a named type (i.e.: enum value_t { RUNTIME=-1 };),
it doesn't compile.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45012


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-07-21  3:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-21  2:43 [Bug c++/45012] New: " rodolfo at rodsoft dot org
2010-07-21  2:49 ` [Bug c++/45012] " rodolfo at rodsoft dot org
2010-07-21  2:53 ` [Bug c++/45012] New: " Andrew Pinski
2010-07-21  2:54 ` [Bug c++/45012] " pinskia at gmail dot com
2010-07-21  3:03 ` rodolfo at rodsoft dot org [this message]
     [not found] <bug-45012-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2011-09-26 18:31 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-09-27  2:40 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-11-17 16:11 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100721030317.18074.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).